1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb11344.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfusion of Immobilized Isolated Nerve Terminals as a Model for the Regulation of Transmitter Release: Release of Different, Endogenous Transmitters, Repeated Stimulation, and High Time Resolution

Abstract: To study the release of neurotransmitters, i.e., the recruitment of transmitters for release and the regulation of the release process, isolated nerve terminals (synaptosomes) of the rat forebrain were immobilized in Sephadex gel inside a perfusion chamber. In this way, the following were achieved: (a) A very limited pressure stress was exerted on the synaptosomes, so that these remained viable for long periods (greater than 30 min) inside the chamber and did not elute from the chamber, which allowed long-term… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although LDCVs have been assumed to be unable for recycling and fully dependent on new synthesis of their peptide transmitter content in the cell body and subsequent transport towards the nerve terminal, recent evidence in neuroendocrine cells suggests that these larger vesicles regularly did not secrete their full peptide content during fusion and could be recycled in order to be used for a next exocytotic round [30,31]. Extrapolation of these findings to small nerve terminals requires care, but repeated secretion of peptide from isolated nerve terminals by subsequent massive stimulatory pulses would be in agreement with such a mechanism [32]. Besides the differential transmitter release from different vesicle types as a presynaptic instrument for functional diversification common in many synapses, the whole architecture of the nerve terminal is highly determining as well.…”
Section: Differentiation In Presynaptic Structural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although LDCVs have been assumed to be unable for recycling and fully dependent on new synthesis of their peptide transmitter content in the cell body and subsequent transport towards the nerve terminal, recent evidence in neuroendocrine cells suggests that these larger vesicles regularly did not secrete their full peptide content during fusion and could be recycled in order to be used for a next exocytotic round [30,31]. Extrapolation of these findings to small nerve terminals requires care, but repeated secretion of peptide from isolated nerve terminals by subsequent massive stimulatory pulses would be in agreement with such a mechanism [32]. Besides the differential transmitter release from different vesicle types as a presynaptic instrument for functional diversification common in many synapses, the whole architecture of the nerve terminal is highly determining as well.…”
Section: Differentiation In Presynaptic Structural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is likely that regional differences in anesthetic sensitivity also exist for other transmitters based on their distinct presynaptic regulatory mechanisms (Snyder et al, 2007; Verhage et al, 1992). This is exemplified by the more potent inhibition by isoflurane of acetylcholine-evoked norepinephrine release from hippocampal nerve terminals mediated by presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Westphalen et al, 2009), and by the lesser anesthetic sensitivity of neuropeptide transmitter release from large dense core vesicles (Pashkov and Hemmings, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quick and thorough mixing and to prevent NT reuptake (20,25), synaptosomes (10 -25 g of protein) were diluted by the stimulus 8-fold. Using high K ϩ , maximal release was achieved at 25 mM K ϩ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%