Periauricular Purse-String Reinforced with SMAS plication and Malaria Fat Pad Elevation for Mid-and Lower Facial Rejuvenation

Wang, Rongrong; Yang, Jie; Guo, Ke; Zhong, Aimei; Tong, Jing; Xiong, Lingyun; Sun, Jiaming

doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000001496

Cited by 15 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Results show durability (1 year) [ 8 , 62 ] and high satisfaction with facial appearance and psychological function for both surgical or minimally invasive facelift [ 8 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 62 , 80 ]. Sinno et al found that patients felt they appeared 2.5–7 years younger [ 14 ] .The use of area-specific FACE-Q scales showed significant improvement in multiple facial regions [ 9 – 11 , 62 , 80 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction In the past decade there has been an increasing interest in the field of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which are now commonly used alongside traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity and mortality. Since the FACE-Q Aesthetic development in 2010, it has been widely used in clinical practice and research, measuring the quality of life and patient satisfaction. It quantifies the impact and change across different aspects of cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. We review how researchers have utilized the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to date, and aim to understand better whether and how it has enhanced our understanding and practice of aesthetic facial procedures. Methods We performed a systematic search of the literature. Publications that used the FACE-Q Aesthetic module to evaluate patient outcomes were included. Publications about the development of PROMs or modifications of the FACE-Q Aesthetic, translation or validation studies of the FACE-Q Aesthetic scales, papers not published in English, reviews, comments/discussions, or letters to the editor were excluded. Results Our search produced 1189 different articles; 70 remained after applying in- and exclusion criteria. Significant findings and associations were further explored. The need for evidence-based patient-reported outcome caused a growing uptake of the FACE-Q Aesthetic in cosmetic surgery and dermatology an increasing amount of evidence concerning facelift surgery, botulinum toxin, rhinoplasty, soft tissue fillers, scar treatments, and experimental areas. Discussion The FACE-Q Aesthetic has been used to contribute substantial evidence about the outcome from the patient perspective in cosmetic facial surgery and minimally invasive treatments. The FACE-Q Aesthetic holds great potential to improve quality of care and may fundamentally change the way we measure success in plastic surgery and dermatology. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The initial search returned 3479 articles, which was reduced to 229 articles after review of title and abstract for relevant context. Full-text review yielded 65 relevant articles 3–7,11,21–27,29–35,37,41–87 (Fig. 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evidence-Based and Case-Based Comparison of Modern Facelift Techniques

Avashia

Stuzin

Cason

et al. 2022

Plastic &Amp; Reconstructive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Facial aging is a multifactorial process that affects each component of facial anatomy. The two general groups of face lift techniques are superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) elevation and SMAS manipulation. The purpose of this article is to describe and compare the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of face lift techniques. Methods: A systematic review was performed to describe current outcomes evidence for face lift techniques. A subcohort of articles was selected for case-based analysis based on designated facial assessment criteria. Analysis was performed to determine the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of each respective technique. Results: A total of 65 articles were selected for systematic review, of which 15 met criteria for case-based review. Patient satisfaction was found to be equivocal for various face lift techniques. Specific advantages and disadvantages for each face lift technique were dependent on the techniques’ approach to skin shift vector along with its degree of mobilizing superficial facial fat. Facial fat grafting was universally applicable for restoration of deep malar volume. Facial fat grafting was also used differently depending on the SMAS technique to address its specific limitations. Conclusions: The authors’ review confirms that there are many methods to obtain excellent outcomes in facial rejuvenation. Experienced surgeons are able to obtain consistent results through a variety of techniques based on understanding the aesthetic needs of the individual patient, the quality of the soft tissues being manipulated, and how to vary a specific technique to reach desired aesthetic end points.

show abstract

“…Plication is also very reliable to obtain an efficient redraping of the platysma. [64][65][66][67] Platysma muscle is the main constituent of the SMAS and the most superficial muscle of the neck. 52 Its innervation is guaranteed by the cervical branch of the facial nerve.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conservative Neck Rejuvenation

Gasperoni¹,

Gasperoni²,

Pino

2021

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the field of facial rejuvenation, among the recurrent topics, one of the most discussed is the return to less invasive techniques. Lower face rejuvenation is best achieved acting on the platysma muscle. Many techniques are used and usually include platysma section, redundancy reduction, and redraping. Platysma plication is also used especially in secondary cases because of the increased risk of nerve injury due to possible anatomical damage caused by previous operations. A technique that preserves the deep planes based on a new plication method is proposed (conservative neck rejuvenation). In this technique, the dissection plane is only subcutaneous to reduce the risk of nerve injuries. An effective neck contouring is possible using a simpler technique with very good results and a lower rate of morbidity.

show abstract

Periauricular Purse-String Reinforced with SMAS plication and Malaria Fat Pad Elevation for Mid-and Lower Facial Rejuvenation

Abstract: Periauricular purse-string reinforced with SMAS plication and malar fat pad elevation technique produces esthetically pleasing outcomes, besides being simple, safe, and personalized.

Cited by 15 publications

References 20 publications

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

The Use of the FACE-Q Aesthetic: A Narrative Review

An Evidence-Based and Case-Based Comparison of Modern Facelift Techniques

Conservative Neck Rejuvenation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About