1984
DOI: 10.1136/jech.38.2.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perinatal mortality in rural India: a strategy for reduction through primary care. I Stillbirths.

Abstract: SUMMARY In a prospective community based study of the distribution and determinants of stillbirths in a rural area of Maharashtra, India, that was carried out for two years, 3129 singleton and 22 twin births were recorded in a population of 47 000. Of the 3173 babies, 85 singletons and five of the twins were stillborn giving a stillbirth rate of 28 4/1000 births. The causes of stillbirths are analysed and the possibility of reducing the unacceptably high stillbirth rate by adequate training of grassroot level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, women who had no antenatal care had a higher risk for a stillbirth compared to those women with antenatal care. In India, Shah et al found that stillbirth rates among women without antenatal care (ANC) were higher than women with ANC [9]. Our data support prior studies, Reeske et al reported that mothers living in the most deprived areas had an increased risk of stillbirth, as did women who were or had a partner who was unemployed [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a result, women who had no antenatal care had a higher risk for a stillbirth compared to those women with antenatal care. In India, Shah et al found that stillbirth rates among women without antenatal care (ANC) were higher than women with ANC [9]. Our data support prior studies, Reeske et al reported that mothers living in the most deprived areas had an increased risk of stillbirth, as did women who were or had a partner who was unemployed [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Usha shah et al had similar finding. [10] Imtiaz JEHAN et al in their study observed that 95% of all women received at least one antenatal care visit, while in our study it was about 47 % ; 72 % of the live births received more than 4 visits compared to 69% of women with a stillbirth. [6] C.U.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Southwick et al [ 51 ] found that among women with inadequately treated current syphilis, those without ANC were more likely to have a stillborn infant than those with ANC (OR = 9.5; 95% CI: 4.0–23.5) [LOE: 2-] . In India, Shah et al [ 52 ] found stillbirth rates of 35.1/1000 vs. 20.8/1000 among women without ANC vs women with ANC, respectively (P < 0.05) [LOE: 2+] . Using German registry data, Gunter et al [ 53 ] retrospectively compared pregnancies without any ANC (N = 2208) with pregnancies with standard ANC (N = 163,143), and found a six-fold increased risk of stillbirth among women without prenatal care (OR = 6.1, 95% CI: 4.7–7.8, P < 0.01), though the study design was unable to adjust for confounding [LOE: 2-] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%