2015
DOI: 10.1080/0740817x.2015.1122253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic inspection frequency and inventory policies for ak-out-of-nsystem

Abstract: We investigate maintenance and inventory policy for a k-out-of-n system in which the components' failures are hidden and follow a non-homogeneous Poisson process. Two types of inspections are performed to find failed components: planned periodic inspections and unplanned opportunistic inspections. The latter are performed at system failure times when n-k+1 components are down simultaneously. In all cases, the failed components are either minimally repaired or replaced with spare parts from the inventory. The i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avenues for further progress include a more comprehensive methodology to include analysis of multiple subsystems and to determine statistical dependence between subsystems of a complex repairable system. Furthermore, given current maintenance effects and failure rates, periodic intervals for various PM types and inspections can be optimized …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Avenues for further progress include a more comprehensive methodology to include analysis of multiple subsystems and to determine statistical dependence between subsystems of a complex repairable system. Furthermore, given current maintenance effects and failure rates, periodic intervals for various PM types and inspections can be optimized …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, given current maintenance effects and failure rates, periodic intervals for various PM types and inspections can be optimized. [27][28][29][30][31]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research proposed by (Sheng , 2016) that discussed about joint optimization of spare parts inventory and maintenance in the aviation field. Last research, proposed by [6] discusses about joint optimization of spare parts inventory and maintenance using simulation method. In this research, we consider failure rate, deterioration rate, and imperfect maintenance to solve spare part inventory and maintenance problem.…”
Section: Related Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the side of maintenance, both the age-based (usage-based) [2-5] and block-based (period-based) PM policies [6-9] are considered. In addition, several recent studies considered joint PM and SPL decision-making for advanced asset systems, such as a serial-connected multi-part asset structure [10-12], k-out-of-n asset structure [13,14], flexible-connect multi-part asset structure [15], and simple asset structure with multiple failure modes [16].…”
Section: Of 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the side of maintenance, both the age-based (usage-based) [2-5] and block-based (period-based) PM policies [6-9] are considered. In addition, several recent studies considered joint PM and SPL decision-making for advanced asset systems, such as a serial-connected multi-part asset structure [10-12], k-out-of-n asset structure [13,14], flexible-connect multi-part asset structure [15], and simple asset structure with multiple failure modes [16].From the side of SPL, joint decision-making problems have been considered in both continuous-review inventory systems [2,3,15] and periodical-review inventory systems [9,12]. These works evaluated several inventory management strategies, including the periodic review inventory replenishment policy (often referred to in the SPL literature as the "(R, S) replenishment policy") [9,17], the so-called min-max replenishment policy (often referred to in the SPL literature as the "(s, S) replenishment policy") [2,3,5,16], and the strategy with reserved inventories for PMs [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%