2001
DOI: 10.1029/1999ja900186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic variations of geocoronal Balmer‐alpha brightness due to solar‐driven exospheric abundance variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensity observed in Wisconsin was about 50% higher at solar maximum than at solar minimum for a shadow altitude of 3000 km during solar cycles 22 and 23. However, opposite results were found for an observation at Arecibo, Puerto Rico, in 1983; the Balmer-a intensity was about 50% higher during the solar minimum than during the solar maximum for a shadow altitude less than ∼2000 km [Kerr et al, 2001].…”
Section: Geocoronamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The intensity observed in Wisconsin was about 50% higher at solar maximum than at solar minimum for a shadow altitude of 3000 km during solar cycles 22 and 23. However, opposite results were found for an observation at Arecibo, Puerto Rico, in 1983; the Balmer-a intensity was about 50% higher during the solar minimum than during the solar maximum for a shadow altitude less than ∼2000 km [Kerr et al, 2001].…”
Section: Geocoronamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…If confined to a single element detector, such as a photomultiplier tube (PMT), the interferometer must be scanned through the desired spectral interval, sequentially sampling one spectral resolution element dl at a time. Although there are a number of ways to accomplish this (e.g., mechanical, tilt, or pressure scanning) the method most commonly used in geocoronal Balmer a studies involves pressure scanning (see e.g., Atreya et al, 1975;Meriwether et al, 1980;Shih et al, 1985;Yelle and Roesler, 1985;Harlander and Roesler, 1989;Kerr et al, 1986;Kerr et al, 2001a, b;Nossal et al, 1993).…”
Section: Pressure Scanning and Pressure Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ground-based Fabry-Perot observations of geocoronal hydrogen have been made over the last several decades with increasing instrumental capabilities (Reynolds et al, 1973;Atreya et al, 1975;Meriwether et al, 1980;Yelle and Roesler, 1985;Shih et al, 1985, Kerr et al, 1986, 2001aKerr and Tepley, 1988;He et al, 1993; , 1997Bishop et al, 2001Bishop et al, , 2004Mierkiewicz, 2002; and references therein), recent advances in detector technology, such as the charged-coupled-device (CCD), and its application to Fabry-Perot spectroscopy (e.g., CCD annular summing spectroscopy), have greatly improved the quality and quantity of geocoronal Balmer a emissions data. Scientific areas of focus include:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somewhat weaker is the emission between 4652Å and 4650Å, corresponding to the blended The second panel shows the spectral interval 4843Å to 4876Å covering the H β line at 4861Å. There is weak emission at the unshifted line throughout the interval, most probably coming from the scattering in the geocorona or from a galactic source (see the discussion of H α emission by Kerr et al, 2001). Doppler shifted and broadened hydrogen emission is seen between 15:30 UT and 17:00 UT, intensifying at 16:30 UT, and later on as weaker and more time varying emissions between 17:15 UT and 18:00 UT.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%