2016
DOI: 10.21767/2572-309x.100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in the literature, 1,2,8–11,14,15,23 clinical outcomes / characteristics of the women in R group were better than Lap. group and some of them were similar to L/S group in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported in the literature, 1,2,8–11,14,15,23 clinical outcomes / characteristics of the women in R group were better than Lap. group and some of them were similar to L/S group in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The Society of Gynecologic Oncology in the USA recently recommended that patient‐reported HRQoL be assessed along with clinical outcomes in future research 6 . However, current studies related to robotic gynecologic surgery have compared it with both laparoscopy and laparotomy, focusing on common perioperative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, conversion to laparotomy, complication rates, hospital LOS, and rates of hospital readmission 1,8–11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies in the literature comparing open surgery with laparoscopy [4,5,8] and laparoscopy with roboticassisted surgery [9,10], and meta-analysis comparing the three approaches [11,12]. However, there is scant data on clinical outcomes where the standard of care directly shifted from open to robotic-assisted surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%