BACKGROUND: Previous prediction algorithms to achieve target CD34+ goals have not been widely adopted, with many centers still using a set volume to process for hematopoietic progenitor cell collections. This may be because previous algorithms are challenging to implement. Additionally, no study has yet examined the utility of adjusting the collect flow rate (CFR) based on the donor's preprocedure total mononuclear cell (MNC) count, which correlates with CD34+ yield. ABBREVIATIONS: ACD = anticoagulant citrate dextrose; CE = collection efficiency; CFR = collect flow rate; CMNC = continuous mononuclear cell collection; HPC = hematopoietic progenitor cell; MNC = mononuclear cell; NMDP = National Marrow Donor Program; PB = peripheral blood; TBV = total blood volume. * Benchmark CE used was 55% (between mean and median). CE = collection efficiency; CFR = collect flow rate; NA = not available.Volume 59, February 2019 TRANSFUSION 661 A DUAL STRATEGY TO OPTIMIZE HPC COLLECTIONS 16.5 (3.5-46.9) 16.6 AE 9.0 0.0002 18.3 AE 11.7 21 (8-74) 28 AE 4.0 9.0 (4.5-22.5) NA Median (range) and/or mean AE standard deviation. * First number is multiple myeloma continuous subset, second number is other entities continuous subset. † Excluding large-volume leukaphereses of > 30 L and > 4 TBV processed, where CE was lower. CE = collection efficiency; MNC = mononuclear cell; NA = not available. Volume 59, February 2019 TRANSFUSION 665 A DUAL STRATEGY TO OPTIMIZE HPC COLLECTIONS