1992
DOI: 10.2307/1467561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periphyton Response to Longitudinal Nutrient Depletion in a Woodland Stream: Evidence of Upstream-Downstream Linkage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results differ from those of Peters [1994] The results presented here support the findings of previous studies in WB. Nutrient mass balances computed at monthly intervals across a 140-m segment showed large net uptake of inorganic N and P during the autumn, winter, and spring and net release during summer [Mulholland, 1992] Sharp longitudinal declines in SRP concentrations downstream from large springs in WB, presumably due to biological uptake, were observed during autumn and spring but were absent in summer [Mulholland and Rosemond, 1992].…”
Section: Annual Patterns Of Daily Par In Wb Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, our results differ from those of Peters [1994] The results presented here support the findings of previous studies in WB. Nutrient mass balances computed at monthly intervals across a 140-m segment showed large net uptake of inorganic N and P during the autumn, winter, and spring and net release during summer [Mulholland, 1992] Sharp longitudinal declines in SRP concentrations downstream from large springs in WB, presumably due to biological uptake, were observed during autumn and spring but were absent in summer [Mulholland and Rosemond, 1992].…”
Section: Annual Patterns Of Daily Par In Wb Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Volumetric excretion estimates the contribution of the excreted nutrient to nutrient concentrations in flowing water, and was calculated as: (Mulholland and Rosemond 1992; W.R. Hill, unpublished data). Mean stream width was determined from a previously published regression between stream discharge at the weir and width (Roberts and others 2007); water velocity was determined from a relationship between the travel time of the conservative tracer (measured as specific conductivity) from nutrient releases and stream discharge at the weir (velocity = 13.707 * Q weir + 49.386; R 2 = 0.97); and mean stream depth was calculated from a previously published relationship between discharge at the weir and depth (Roberts and others 2007).…”
Section: Volumetric Excretion and Excretion Turnover Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, however, NO 3 -N concentrations essentially return to background levels by summer due to uptake in soils and (possibly) uptake in stream water (Mulholland, 1992;Mulholland and Rosemond, 1992). Where sampling continued beyond the summer following fertilization into subsequent fall and winter periods (Malueg et al, 1972;Moore, 1971;Fredriksen et al, 1975;Meehan et al, 1975;Stay et al, 1979;Hetherington, 1985), a fall NO 3 -N peak, which is elevated relative to that in control streams, has been observed.…”
Section: Longer-term Nutrient Losses To Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During late spring and early summer, nitrate concentrations in streams affected by, and downstream of, fertilization decline in conjunction with declines in stream discharge. Reasons for these reductions include uptake by plants and trees in forest soils, denitrification or sequestration in hyporheic environments, and uptake by periphyton in streams (Mulholland, 1992;Mulholland and Rosemond, 1992). Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) remains proportionally high (Sollins and McCorrison, 1981;Triska et.…”
Section: Conceptual Model Of Ecological Processing Of Fertilizer Nitrmentioning
confidence: 99%