2016
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periprosthetic Infection following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Limiting the Postoperative Surveillance Period

Abstract: BACKGROUND Hip and knee arthroplasty infections are associated with considerable healthcare costs. The merits of reducing the postoperative surveillance period from 1 year to 90 days have been debated. OBJECTIVES To report the first pan-Canadian hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates and to describe the implications of a shorter (90-day) postoperative surveillance period. METHODS Prospective surveillance for infection following hip and knee arthroplasty was conducted by hospitals participating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…SSI is defined as an infection that occurs after surgery in the part of the body where the surgery took place within 90 days of surgery [ 6 , 7 ]. Surgical site infection may include purulent drainage from incision, positive fluid or tissue cultures on aseptically obtained samples, wound dehiscence or wound reopened by the surgeon in presence of fever, pain or tenderness, localized swelling, and redness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSI is defined as an infection that occurs after surgery in the part of the body where the surgery took place within 90 days of surgery [ 6 , 7 ]. Surgical site infection may include purulent drainage from incision, positive fluid or tissue cultures on aseptically obtained samples, wound dehiscence or wound reopened by the surgeon in presence of fever, pain or tenderness, localized swelling, and redness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, a reduction in follow-up period defining surgical site infections occurred, which could reduce the hospital prevalence of these infections. 26 Fourth, laboratory practices have changed over time; for example, laboratories now use more sensitive assays to detect C. difficile infection, which could result in an increase in prevalence. 27 Never theless, by adopting the same methods, timing, similar definitions, hospital type and case mix, we have attempted to minimize the potential for protocol variation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(CNISP) provides data on the incidence of selected health careassociated infections and antimicrobial resistant organisms [11][12][13][14][15] and conducted point-prevalence surveys in 2002 and 2009. 16,17 In 2017, we replicated a point-prevalence survey in CNISP hospitals, to provide an up-to-date estimate of the burden of health careassociated infections and antimicrobial-resistant organisms causing these infections in Canadian hospitals, and to describe the trends observed over time in the 3 surveys.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Canadian study found an incidence of 1.64 infections per 100 hip arthroplasties and 1.52 infections per 100 knee arthroplasties over a 3-year period. 1 Risk factors include obesity, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive medications, previous revisions and/or infections of the prosthesis, rheumatoid arthritis and malignancy. 2 Prosthetic joint infections are associated with poor outcomes, with 5-year mortality rates of greater than 20% and threefold higher age-adjusted odds of mortality compared with the general population.…”
Section: Prosthetic Joint Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%