Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tersangka Dalam Batas Waktu Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum Menurut Hak Asasi Manusia

Suswantoro, Suswantoro; Suhartono, Slamet; Sugianto, Fajar

doi:10.30996/jhmo.v0i0.1768

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Perlindungan hukum terhadap setiap pelaku kejahatan adalah kewajiban bagi setiap aparat Polri sebagai upaya penghormatan dan perlindungan terhadap HAM, dalam rangka penegakan hukum pada tingkat Kepolisian (Martono, 2020: 104). Berdasarkan ketentuan yang terdapat dalam KUHAP, status tersangka yang ditetapkan oleh penyidik tergantung berapa lama proses penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh penyidik .Perubahan status tersangka akan diperoleh, jika penyidik telah melimpahkan perkara kepada kejaksaan dan kejaksaan menganggap berkas perkara tersebut lengkap, maka kejaksaan akan segera melimpahkan perkara tersebut ke pengadilan (Suswantoro et al, 2018).…”

Section: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Penahanan Menuru...unclassified

Penahanan Tersangka dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Anzhari,

Sunardi,

Muhibbin

2024

WIDYUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to describe the provisions of Indonesian criminal law regarding the detention of suspects and to analyze the legal protection of suspects during detention in terms ofIndonesian criminal law. This research is normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system and legal values related to the detention of suspects in the study of Indonesian criminal law. The results of the study show that the provisions for detaining suspects are regulated in Article 1 point 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Criminal Procedure. While in detention, suspects can exercise their rights in accordance with articles 50 to 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Legal protection is always associated with the concept of rechtstaat or the concept of the Rule of Law because the birth of these concepts cannot be separated from the desire to provide recognition and protection of human rights. A suspect has rights at the time of detention that are guaranteed by law, such as the right to receive and read a Detention Warrant or a Judge's Order which lists the identity of the suspect or defendant and states the reasons for the detention and a brief description of the crime case being suspected or charged and the place where he is being detained in accordance with Article 21 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Codes

show abstract

Section: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Penahanan Menuru...unclassified

Penahanan Tersangka dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Anzhari,

Sunardi,

Muhibbin

2024

WIDYUR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Guarantees of respect, protection, and enforcement of citizens' rights are constitutional rights, including, the right to equality before the law, the right to recognition, guaranteed protection, and fair legal certainty, as well as the right to equal treatment before the law. The human rights of suspects and legal protection rights for suspects have been regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code as regulations that guide criminal acts in the justice system 30 .…”

Section: Forms Of Warranties For the Protection Of Criminal Actors An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Paradox: Protection of Victims Taking the Law into Vigilantism

Adiyatma

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Widespread public ignorance about vigilante behavior has led to violent incidents in which individuals use violence as a means to vent their emotions on criminals they apprehend directly. Unfortunately, some victims have lost their lives due to these actions. This behavior can be equated with the crime of torture when viewed from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law, which does not have specific rules regarding vigilante acts. Due to anxiety and distrust of law enforcement agencies, vigilantism is becoming increasingly common. Through normative studies using both the old and newest Criminal Codes and other regulations as internal parameters, we can understand the seriousness of the government's role as a stakeholder in regulating society through the law. By combining various sociological approaches, research can thoroughly investigate the condition of society. The discussion begins with understanding the concept of vigilantism, legal protection, and legal assistance, forming a pattern of thinking about society, followed by an understanding of the rule of law that overshadows vigilante actions from both the perpetrator and victim's perspective. With the hope that basic individual rights are maintained in the Indonesian state with the Pancasila ideology, the law aims to establish public order with a general perspective to achieve the necessary justice. This requires understanding and support from all parties. In essence, future efforts must be preventive and repressive.

show abstract

“…65/PUU-IX/2011 which stipulates that "Determination of Suspects" is part of the pretrial. Protection of the suspect's rights in the end does not necessarily abort the alleged crime, re-investigation can still be carried out following the appropriate rules and rules (Suswantoro et al, 2018).…”

Section: Efforts To Determinementioning

confidence: 99%

Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013

Nugraha

Setiawan²,

Serfiyani³

2022

Jur. Mah. Kaj. Il. Huk.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 21 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code are deemed to be contradicting Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution. Through the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 excluding the phrase "unpleasant actions" because they are considered to cause multiple interpretations and put forward subjectivity. This article is exposed to arbitrary actions by the authorities to criminalize someone. In fact, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, there are still pre-trial cases of determining suspects based on unpleasant acts. The formulation of Article 335 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which is used after the decision, requires the fulfillment of 2 (two) elements, namely "using violence" or "threat of violence." Thus, in every indictment that wrote the phrase "unpleasant act" was considered a legal reason. Determination of a suspect because this is considered a formal defect

show abstract

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tersangka Dalam Batas Waktu Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum Menurut Hak Asasi Manusia

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Penahanan Tersangka dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Penahanan Tersangka dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia

Legal Paradox: Protection of Victims Taking the Law into Vigilantism

Legal Protection Against Status Determination of Suspects for Unpleasant Crimes After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1/PUU-XI/2013

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About