2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resu.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permanencia y abandono de estudios en estudiantes universitarios: un análisis desde la teoría organizacional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, its use allows the theoretical framework of student dropout to be understood from a holistic viewpoint, integrating the perspectives of the academic community, state and social agents. With this integration of perspectives, the study of dropout has been carried out from a multidisciplinary orientation in which the sociological, interactionist, organisational, psychological and economic approach are highlighted (Lázaro Alvarez et al, 2020), and have resulted in the analysis of variables intrinsic and extrinsic to the student, categorising them into four determinants: individual, socioeconomic, academic and institutional (Fonseca and García, 2016;Barragán and González, 2017;Donoso and Schiefelbein, 2021;Guzmán et al, 2021).…”
Section: Dropout and The Theoretical Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, its use allows the theoretical framework of student dropout to be understood from a holistic viewpoint, integrating the perspectives of the academic community, state and social agents. With this integration of perspectives, the study of dropout has been carried out from a multidisciplinary orientation in which the sociological, interactionist, organisational, psychological and economic approach are highlighted (Lázaro Alvarez et al, 2020), and have resulted in the analysis of variables intrinsic and extrinsic to the student, categorising them into four determinants: individual, socioeconomic, academic and institutional (Fonseca and García, 2016;Barragán and González, 2017;Donoso and Schiefelbein, 2021;Guzmán et al, 2021).…”
Section: Dropout and The Theoretical Reference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es un constructo opuesto al burnout, que viene a ser un estado mental negativo y de pérdida de interés por una actividad (Maslach et al, 2001;Salanova et al, 2000). Un estudiante que no muestre engagement tiene muchas posibilidades de fracasar y de abandonar los estudios que ha iniciado (Fonseca & García, 2016).…”
Section: Relieveunclassified
“…estado de bienestar cuando se enfrentan al proceso formativo, cuentan con condiciones favorables para lograr las metas educativas (Carmona-Halty et al, 2017). Este pensamiento positivo que está asociado al engagement aporta la energía y la disposición para ser eficaces y afrontar el proceso de aprendizaje de forma satisfactoria, reduciendo de este modo el riesgo de la desconexión académica y el abandono de los estudios (Fonseca & García, 2016).…”
Section: │14unclassified
“…In addition, populations composed of ethnic minorities or specific groups, such as the handicapped and high-performance athletes, are at a higher risk of dropout. Belonging to an ethnic group implies a language barrier (with mother tongue different from the official), and discrimination experiencies and prejudice that has negative repercussions on social adaptation (Fonseca and García, 2016). "Family size", "type of housing", "socio-educational level of parents" and "presence of difficulties" are the most influential family variables.…”
Section: Personal Family and Socioeconomic Variables Associated With University Dropoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%