2014
DOI: 10.1111/gfl.12091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability changes in simulated granite faults during and after frictional sliding

Abstract: Thermal-hydrological-mechanical coupling processes suggest that fault permeability should undergo dynamic change as a result of seismic slip. In igneous rocks, a fault's slip surface may have much higher permeability than the surrounding rock matrix and therefore operate as a conduit for fluids. We conducted laboratory experiments to investigate changes in fracture permeability (or transmissivity) of a fault in granite due to shear slip and cyclic heating and cooling. Our experiments showed that high initial f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strength contrast possibly influences the development process of the décollement itself. Fluid permeability perpendicular to the fault plane tends to decrease with the slip displacement and the fault may act as a barrier (Faulkner et al 2010;Tanikawa et al 2014;Yamashita and Tsutsumi 2018). Generated or advected fluids thus flow beneath the décollement plane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strength contrast possibly influences the development process of the décollement itself. Fluid permeability perpendicular to the fault plane tends to decrease with the slip displacement and the fault may act as a barrier (Faulkner et al 2010;Tanikawa et al 2014;Yamashita and Tsutsumi 2018). Generated or advected fluids thus flow beneath the décollement plane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the peak friction coefficients are all at ~0.7, similar to the dry results, while the steady state values are lower than the dry results and show a decreasing trend with increasing normal stress. Higher normal stress implies that more frictional heating can be generated, while the gouge layer is expected to be less permeable [ Tanikawa et al ., ]. In general, this will result in more efficient fluid pressurization, giving rise to a lower effective normal stress and therefore faster slip‐weakening (smaller D w ) and lower apparent dynamic friction (smaller μ ss ).…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for reliable extrapolation to deeper GCS fields, we need a microphysical model accommodating the effects of temperature and effective normal stress. The applied experimental loading velocity (10 0 µm/s to 10 1 µm/s) does not purport to cover the full spectrum of possible seismic or aseismic transient slip velocities but represents a narrow range where contrasting responses of different mineralogies may be explored, with velocity as a control parameter. As the sliding velocity in these experiments is approximately 2 orders of magnitude lower than similar experiments, no thermal pressurization effect is considered [ Rice , ; Tanikawa et al ., , ].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%