2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeability study of cancellous bone and its idealised structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of permeability measured for the samples fabricated in this work are underestimated by three orders of magnitude compared to those measured by Grimm and Williams [31] for the human trabecular bone (0.4-11 × 10 −9 m 2 ) and those experimentally measured by Nauman et al [11] in human vertebral and proximal femur bones, which have a large range of permeability values for human bones (2.68 × 10 −11 -2 × 10 −8 m 2 ). On the other hand, the permeability values are in good agreement with the range measured for the natural cancellous bone (3 × 10 −13 -7.4 × 10 −12 m 2 ) [32], which also has a maximal anisotropy in the permeability (axial/radial) of five times, similar to what was obtained by the radial configuration of layers. This is in agreement with that reported by Nauman et al [11], who pointed out that permeability in human bones can reach high anisotropy in the permeability values, as much 22 times of difference between axial and radial directions.…”
Section: Permeability Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The values of permeability measured for the samples fabricated in this work are underestimated by three orders of magnitude compared to those measured by Grimm and Williams [31] for the human trabecular bone (0.4-11 × 10 −9 m 2 ) and those experimentally measured by Nauman et al [11] in human vertebral and proximal femur bones, which have a large range of permeability values for human bones (2.68 × 10 −11 -2 × 10 −8 m 2 ). On the other hand, the permeability values are in good agreement with the range measured for the natural cancellous bone (3 × 10 −13 -7.4 × 10 −12 m 2 ) [32], which also has a maximal anisotropy in the permeability (axial/radial) of five times, similar to what was obtained by the radial configuration of layers. This is in agreement with that reported by Nauman et al [11], who pointed out that permeability in human bones can reach high anisotropy in the permeability values, as much 22 times of difference between axial and radial directions.…”
Section: Permeability Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The static mechanical performance of the bone scaffold was evaluated mainly through statics simulation and experiment, and the permeability performance of the bone scaffold was evaluated by fluid dynamic simulation. This study was more comprehensive than the previous study by Syahrom and Wang et al on the cubic scaffold structure [9,10]; Montazeriana et al on the hexagonal and rhombic dodecahedral scaffold structure [12]; and Alaboodi et al on the scaffold with circular aperture [15]. Their researches were more focused on the single compression performance or permeability performance of the scaffold structure, and the experimental results lack a direct comparison with the performance of human tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Metal porous materials, ceramic porous materials, resin porous materials and other porous materials have become the key research objects during the recent years. Syahrom et al proposed body-centered cubic structure, face-centered cubic structure and tetrahedral plate structure [9]. Wang et al designed and prepared body-centered cubic structure of titanium alloy, and studied its mechanical properties [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Darcy regime corresponds to flow rates situated between 0.007 and 0.08 L/min, where the Reynolds number ranges from 1 to 10. These flow rate values are in the same range as those used for permeability testing of bone or engineered lattice structures in [40,41,52,69], and the fluid velocities (flow Q/area A) are in the same range as those used for fluid flow stimulation of bone cells [70]. The permeabilities of the manufactured structures corresponding to the Darcy regime region are plotted in Figure 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the permeability of bones to fluids, which ensures an adequate nutrient supply to surrounding tissues, average values reported in the literature for vertebrae vary from 0.49 to 44.5 × 10 −9 m 2 , depending on the sample selection and preparation [39][40][41]. In these sources, the absolute permeability k is calculated using Darcy's law by measuring the pressure drop and fluid velocity through a bone sample (Equation ( 5)).…”
Section: Functional Requirements To Intervertebral Cagesmentioning
confidence: 99%