Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae)

Rogers, Donald E.; Skoy, James A

doi:10.1644/888.1

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, sequences from Xalapa, Veracruz and its surrounding locations (GG3, furvus), as well as those from Tlanchinol and Tenango de Doria, Hidalgo, and Zacualpan, Veracruz (GG2, angustirostris), were distinctly separated from each other as the subunits of a third genetic clade. Therefore, the monotypic status currently assigned to the populations in the overall distribution of P. furvus (Rogers and Skoy 2011) does not coincide with our genetic nor the morphometric data. Rather, the data presented herein confirms the morphometric (Musser 1964;Hall 1968;Martínez-Coronel et al 1997;Ávila-Valle et al 2012) andbiochemical (Harris andRogers 1999;Harris et al 2000;Ávila-Valle et al 2012) discrepancies reported previously.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 70%

“…Sequences from the intermediate group localities are needed to resolve this issue. Further, sequences are needed from geographic areas such as Molango, Hidalgo, and from vegetational transition zones between Puebla and Veracruz (e. g., Rogers and Skoy 2011;Peralta-Moctezuma 2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Peromyscus furvus is an endemic Cricetid species from southeastern México that inhabits the temperate cloud and mixed forests from montane highlands and currently is considered as a monotypic species (Rogers and Skoy 2011; but see Ramírez-Pulido et al 2014). Its current distribution ranges from southeastern San Luis Potosí, along the Sierra Madre Oriental, through the Faja Transvolcánica Mexicana and southward to the Sierra Norte de Oaxaca (Rogers and Skoy 2011). The species includes in synonymy (Musser 1964;Hall 1968;Huckaby 1980) Peromyscus latirostris (Dalquest 1950 -type locality Xilitla, San Luis Potosí) and P. angustirostris (Hall and Álvarez 1961 -type locality Zacualpan, Veracruz), as well as unassigned specimens from Puerto de la Soledad, Oaxaca.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although P. furvus currently is considered a monotypic species (Rogers and Skoy 2011), several previous studies, under different epistemological and methodological approaches, have noted differences among its synonyms and assigned populations. Such differences include skull size (Musser 1964;Hall 1968;Martínez-Coronel et al 1997;Ávila-Valle et al 2012), allozymes (Harris andRogers 1999), and mitochondrial genetic sequences (cytochrome-b gene, Harris et al 2000, andND3-ND4 genes, Ávila-Valle et al 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Rejection of the monotypic status of Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with consequences for its species group

Cruz-Gómez

Campillo

Ávila-Valle

et al. 2021

Therya

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous studies using Cytochrome-b or ND3-ND4 mitochondrial gene have yielded intriguing evidence about the phylogenetic relationships among populations of Peromyscus furvus; however, those studies each based on phylogenies for a single type of genes, yielded conflicting topologies. In addition, analyses with traditional morphometrics have revealed differences in skull size among certain populations of the species. Therefore, in order to reassess the systematic and taxonomic status of P. furvus, we incorporated a suite of genetic and morphometric characters and employed cladistic analyses. Herein, we present results mostly derived from our genetic analyses (results from the phylogenetic examination of skull size and shape will appear later). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using four mitochondrial genes (Cytb and ND3-ND4L-ND4) with the respective data analyzed separately or combined, followed by an analysis with genetic and morphometric data (size and shape characters). Most phylogenetic constructions were made with parsimonious methods, but probabilistic methods also were used in the analyses with the genes separated by type. Similar topologies were recovered from all analyses of the Cytb gene and from all parsimony analyses of the NADH genes; however, conflicting topologies were obtained with the probabilistic methods for the NADH genes. Additionally, to better understand the genetic variation in each type of gene, analyses for genetic divergence were conducted within and among genetic groups and haplotype networks were constructed. All the topologies obtained using genetic data questioned the monotypic status of P. furvus, as two additional clades were identified that seemingly correspond to unrecognized entities. The first of these, P. latirostris, occurs in the northern region and could be considered as either a species or subspecies. An unknown Peromyscus species nova that occurs to the south is considered as a valid species. Further, P. furvus s. s. becomes a polytypic species by recognizing at least two subspecies (P. f. angustirostris and P. f. furvus). Phylogenetic analyses also rejected membership of P. melanocarpus and P. ochraventer within the furvus species group. Instead, P. melanocarpus showed a greater affinity to P. mexicanus totontepecus, whereas, P. ochraventer either joined to the clade containing P. melanocarpus and P. m. tototepecus or to Megadontomys cryophilus in a sister clade. Finally, Osgoodomys banderanus (subgenus Haplomylomys) always remained basally positioned and segregated from all members of the subgenus Peromyscus.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 70%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Rejection of the monotypic status of Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with consequences for its species group

Cruz-Gómez

Campillo

Ávila-Valle

et al. 2021

Therya

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Order Rodentia

Álvarez-Castañeda

2024

Mammals of North America - Volume 2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

List of recent land mammals of Mexico, 2014

Ramírez-Pulido¹,

González–Ruiz²,

Gardner³

et al. 2014

Special Publications - The Museum, Texas Tech University

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We provide an updated list of the Recent land mammals of Mexico and include information on the taxonomy of certain species, and where appropriate, the endemic and threatened status of all species listed. Several taxonomic and nomenclatural changes have been made since publication of the last list of the Mexican terrestrial mammalian fauna. Within the period from 2005 to present, there have been at least 209 changes concerning the nomenclature of this fauna; these we evaluated in this paper. The land mammals of Mexico comprise 168 genera, 496 species, and 881 subspecies.

show abstract

Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae)

Cited by 3 publications

References 19 publications

Rejection of the monotypic status of Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with consequences for its species group

Rejection of the monotypic status of Peromyscus furvus (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with consequences for its species group

Order Rodentia

List of recent land mammals of Mexico, 2014

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About