2012
DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perseveration in the Connected Speech of Boys with Fragile X Syndrome with and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: Verbal perseveration is a frequently reported language characteristic of males with Fragile X syndrome and may be a defining feature or hallmark of the syndrome. We compared the verbal perseveration of boys with Fragile X syndrome with (n = 29) and without (n = 30) autism spectrum disorder, boys with Down syndrome (n = 27), and typically developing boys (n = 25) at similar nonverbal mental ages. During a social interaction, boys with both Fragile X syndrome and autism spectrum disorder produced significantly m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One report by Simon, Keenan, Pennington, Taylor, and Hagerman (2001) found that women with the FMR1 premutation (n = 25) did not show any impairments in component discourse processing skills, although other reports do support broader language deficits in this group, such as impaired language formulation (Sterling, Mailick, Greenberg, Warren, & Brady, 2013). In contrast to the scarcity of evidence in the FMR1 premutation, pragmatic language deficits are well documented in the fragile X full mutation (Abbeduto et al, 2006;Losh, Martin, Klusek, HoganBrown, & Sideris, 2012;Martin et al, 2012;Roberts et al, 2007) and are associated with FMR1-related variation (i.e., CGG repeat length and percentage methylation; .…”
Section: Pragmatic Language Phenotype Of the Fmr1 Premutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One report by Simon, Keenan, Pennington, Taylor, and Hagerman (2001) found that women with the FMR1 premutation (n = 25) did not show any impairments in component discourse processing skills, although other reports do support broader language deficits in this group, such as impaired language formulation (Sterling, Mailick, Greenberg, Warren, & Brady, 2013). In contrast to the scarcity of evidence in the FMR1 premutation, pragmatic language deficits are well documented in the fragile X full mutation (Abbeduto et al, 2006;Losh, Martin, Klusek, HoganBrown, & Sideris, 2012;Martin et al, 2012;Roberts et al, 2007) and are associated with FMR1-related variation (i.e., CGG repeat length and percentage methylation; .…”
Section: Pragmatic Language Phenotype Of the Fmr1 Premutationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perseveration has been documented at length (Belser & Sudhalter, 2001; Martin et al, 2012; Roberts, Martin, et al, 2007; Sudhalter et al, 1990; Wolf-Schein et al., 1987). While it is clear that individuals with FXS struggle with pragmatics, the impact of ASD comorbidity on such deficits is less well understood, as most investigations have not accounted for co-occurring ASD.…”
Section: Pragmatic Language In Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fragile Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is clear that individuals with FXS struggle with pragmatics, the impact of ASD comorbidity on such deficits is less well understood, as most investigations have not accounted for co-occurring ASD. Some evidence suggests that ASD comorbidity has an added detrimental effect on pragmatic language abilities; boys with FXS and comorbid ASD exhibit more off-topic conversational turns (Roberts, Martin, et al, 2007), increased stereotyped and perseverative language (Martin et al, 2012; McDuffie et al, 2010), and perform more poorly on standardized pragmatic language assessments (Losh, Martin, Klusek, Hogan-Brown, & Sideris, 2012) than their counterparts without ASD.…”
Section: Pragmatic Language In Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fragile Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulty conveying communicative intent relative to mental age-matched controls has also been observed (Abbeduto et al, 2008). Further, individuals with DS have been reported to demonstrate increased use of stereotyped language as compared to TD controls of a similar mental age (Laws & Bishop, 2004), though at lower rates than observed in other developmental disabilities, such as FXS or ASD (Abbeduto, Brady, & Kover, 2007; Martin, G. E., Roberts, Helm-Estabrooks, Sideris, & Assal, 2012; Roberts et al, 2007). Of note, studies of pragmatic abilities in DS have historically only included boys or combined sexes without examining sex differences, despite well-documented sex differences in pragmatic abilities in typical development (Berghout, Salehi, & Leffler, 1987; Cook, Fritz, McCornack, & Visperas, 1985; Kothari, Skuse, Wakefield, & Micali, 2013; Leaper, 1991; Sigleman & Holtz, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%