Persian čīz and Sanskrit kím

Tedesco, P.

doi:10.2307/410504

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sociolinguistic situation is complicated by the fact that the texts were transmitted orally for millennia. Because of the context of polygossia between the vernaculars spoken by the transmitters and the languages of the texts themselves, certain so-called Middle Indo-Aryanisms imposed themselves upon the language of even the oldest text, the Rig Veda (Tedesco 1945, 1960, Elizarenkova 1989; though see Kuiper 1991 for an opposing point of view). For instance, vocalization of r ˚, a tendency that is more or less complete by MIA times, is already observed in the Rig Veda (e.g., śithirá-'loose' < *śr ˚thirá-).…”

Section: Old Indo Aryan Periodmentioning

confidence: 99%

A probabilistic assessment of the Indo-Aryan Inner–Outer Hypothesis

Cathcart

2020

JHL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper uses a novel data-driven probabilistic approach to address the centuryold Inner-Outer hypothesis of Indo-Aryan. I develop a Bayesian hierarchical mixedmembership model to assess the validity of this hypothesis using a large data set of automatically extracted sound changes operating between Old Indo-Aryan and Modern Indo-Aryan speech varieties. I employ different prior distributions in order to model sound change, one of which, the logistic normal distribution, has not received much attention in linguistics outside of Natural Language Processing, despite its many attractive features. I find evidence for cohesive dialect groups that have made their imprint on contemporary Indo-Aryan languages, and find that when a logistic normal prior is used, the distribution of dialect components across languages is largely compatible with a core-periphery pattern similar to that proposed under the Inner-Outer hypothesis. like the ones mentioned above (cf. Bloomfield 1933:360). However, it is not always clear how to proceed in the face of substantial irregularity and uncertainty. Additionally, it can be difficult to distinguish between shared genetic innovations and parallel developments, though quantitative methods have helped in assessing whether the sharing of multiple features across languages is more likely than chance.This paper seeks to enhance the comparative method with probabilistic tools in order to address an unresolved hypothesis regarding the history of the Indo-Aryan languages. I employ a data-driven Bayesian methodology in order to uncover shared dialectal patterns across a subset of these languages. In particular, I attempt to operationalize an old hypothesis (the so-called Inner-Outer hypothesis) that two large dialect groups existed, and that communication within these groups was greater historically than communication between them. The admixture (alternatively, mixed-membership) model used in this paper serves to reduce the dimensionality of a large set of linguistic features (consisting of sound changes operating between Old Indo-Aryan [OIA, i.e., Sanskrit] and modern Indo-Aryan languages) to two dimensions corresponding to two latent dialectal components, making it possible to assess whether individual languages draw most of their features from one of the two groups, or receive features uniformly from both. Additionally, I evaluate the degree to which the Inner-Outer hypothesis is recapitulated in the language-level distribution over component makeup. I find evidence for two dialect groups of considerable cohesion and integrity, and find partial evidence for the Inner-Outer hypothesis in the language-level distribution of dialect components. This paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of this model and future research directions. 2.

show abstract

Section: Old Indo Aryan Periodmentioning

confidence: 99%

A probabilistic assessment of the Indo-Aryan Inner–Outer Hypothesis

Cathcart

2020

JHL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tedesco 1945with Emeneau 1966. The chronology suggested by this argumentation then would be the following.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sanskrit in the Pre-Islamic Sociolinguistic Context of South Asia

Hock¹,

Pandharipande²

1978

International Journal of the Sociology of Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

1.2. The chronology is misleading, first of all in that Classical Sanskrit and Prakrit clearly were contemporary with each other (cf. section 2 below). Moreover, at least since Weber (1847) it has been argued that Sanskrit and Prakrit really were sister dialects, both descended from the same ancestor, Vedic, and preserving different features of that ancestral dialect. (Cf. Wackernagel 1896:xxv-xxvi for a good summary and discussion of the Brought to you by | University of Michigan Authenticated Download Date | 6/21/15 6:56 AM

show abstract

Le pronom indéfini osque pitpit "quicquid" de Paul Diacre à Jacob Balde: morphosyntaxe comparée des paradigmes *kwi- kwi- du latin et du sabellique

Machajdíková¹,

Martzloff²

2016

Graeco-Latina Brunensia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Persian čīz and Sanskrit kím

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

A probabilistic assessment of the Indo-Aryan Inner–Outer Hypothesis

A probabilistic assessment of the Indo-Aryan Inner–Outer Hypothesis

Sanskrit in the Pre-Islamic Sociolinguistic Context of South Asia

Le pronom indéfini osque pitpit "quicquid" de Paul Diacre à Jacob Balde: morphosyntaxe comparée des paradigmes *kwi- kwi- du latin et du sabellique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About