2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of a keystone microhabitat in boreal forests: Cavities of Eurasian Three-toed Woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite marked differences in the bird assemblages in different parts of Europe, some bird species have similar ecological and geographical preferences. For example, the preference of Three-toed Woodpecker for coniferous trees in Europe has been reported [44,45] and confirmed in our study. In Finland, as in our study, the Goldfinch, Yellowhammer, and Blue Tit preferred deciduous forests in the south [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite marked differences in the bird assemblages in different parts of Europe, some bird species have similar ecological and geographical preferences. For example, the preference of Three-toed Woodpecker for coniferous trees in Europe has been reported [44,45] and confirmed in our study. In Finland, as in our study, the Goldfinch, Yellowhammer, and Blue Tit preferred deciduous forests in the south [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Aspen is an important host for many species. Aspen trees are inhabited by epiphytic bryophytes and lichens (Kuusinen, 1994;Gustafsson and Eriksson, 1995;Hazell, 1998;Pykälä et al, 2006), pathogens (Callan, 1998), herbivorous invertebrates (Robinson et al, 2012), mammals such as the flying squirrel (Pteromys volans; Hanski, 1998;Remm et al 2017) and birds such as woodpeckers and owls (Hågvar et al, 1990;Angelstam and Mikusinski, 1994;Tikkanen et al, 2006;Hardenbol et al 2019). Secondary hole-nesters, including many tits, flycatchers, owls, ducks and flying squirrels, are dependent on cavities excavated by woodpeckers (Martin and Eadie, 1999;Baroni et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavity users may be classified as excavators (e.g., aforementioned woodpeckers) or secondary cavity users (e.g., parrots [Psittaciformes]), the latter depending on existing cavities (Martin & Eadie, 1999). Because of the essential role of cavities for both types of cavity users, followed by associated or cascading ecological interactions, we may find cavity density to be indicative of other elements of forest systems and biodiversities such as richness, intactness, or resilience (Cockle et al, 2012; Hardenbol et al, 2019; Ibarra et al, 2020; Micó et al, 2015). But to effectively gain insights into forest ecosystems from data on cavity density and characteristics, as well as the value of those cavities for cavity users, we first need a region‐specific baseline understanding of cavity availability (Cockle, Martin, & Wesołowski, 2011; Cockle, Martin, & Wiebe, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%