Persistence of full- and part-time farming in Southern China

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractThe goal of this study is to assess the dynamics of rural households' labor market participation in the wake of China's efforts to develop rural labor markets in a manner that is conducive to its transition to a market economy. Based on a theoretical model that emphasizes the impact of duration, i.e. of the number of years households spent part-time farming or fulltime farming, respectively, we investigate the shifts between these two states. We also identify socioeconomic factors that determine these shifts. The empirical study is based on discrete time hazard approaches, using micro-level panel data from Zhejiang, Hubei, andYunnan provinces from 1995 to 2002.Estimation results suggest relatively high chances of shifts from full-time to part-time farming and a considerable lower risk for the shift in the opposite direction. Significant negative duration dependence is found for the move from full-time to part-time farming suggesting lock-in effects. In addition, we find that labor market participation decisions are significantly related to several household, farm and village characteristics. In particular, the likelihood of shifts from full-time farming to part-time farming is positively related to the educational level of households' workforce.JEL Classifications: C41, J22, J 24, J43, J62, Q12

Farm and farmer characteristics and off‐farm work: evidence from Algeria

“…On the other hand, our results are inconsistent with studies on China (Brosig et al . ; Zhao ), Colombia (Deininger and Olinto ), the United States (Chang and Mishra ) and Slovenia (Bojnec et al . ).…”

“…However, for countries with less favourable conditions, studies could not find conclusive evidence (Abdulai and Delgado ; Kimhi and Rapaport ; Brosig et al . ). To circumvent the potential mediating effect of climatic conditions, we use both total arable area (TAA) and total irrigated area (TIA) as proxies for size in our study.…”

Effect of the family life cycle on the family farm scale in Southern China

“…On the one hand, only some rural labourers in a family can go to cities for work and others must take care of the minors and elders. The remaining labourers can undertake part-time farming to increase income (Brosig et al 2009). On the other hand, the reserved farmland and part-time farming thereon are considered as the last living security for the farmers in the event of losing work in the cities or needing to return to the rural areas for any reason (Lin et al 2010).…”

“…One of the important reasons for the decreasing scale of the national farmland is that farmers engaged in non-agricultural industries are not willing to sell farmland. The phenomenon of part-time farming is widespread (Brosig et al 2009). Questions arise as to why the phenomenon of part-time farming is widespread.…”

An explanation of labor migration and grain output growth: Findings of a case study in eastern Tibetan Plateau

“…These studies have shown three scenarios in the linkages between labor migration and agricultural output: (1) If there is sufficient surplus labor, remittances from family members working in cities allow rural residents to purchase high-quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and other new technology and infrastructure to boost crop yields (Stark and Bloom, 1985;Lucas, 1987;Rozelle et al, 1999;Dustmann and Kirchkamp, 2001;Woodruff and Zenteno, 2001;Brière et al, 2002;Black et al, 2003;Taylor et al, 2003;Taylor and López-Feldman, 2010). (2) In the case of a thin labor market and in the absence of surplus labor, labor withdrawal can reduce the on-farm labor as well as the agricultural output (Lipton, 1980;Clay et al, 1998;Macdonald et al, 2000;Mochebelele and Winter-Nelson, 2000;Holden et al, 2004;Strijker, 2005;Tzanopoulos et al, 2007;Yamada et al, 2007;Beyene, 2008;Brosig et al, 2009;Gray, 2009). (3) In the situation of a well-functioning labor market, hired labor can substitute for lost family labor with compromising output (Oseni and Winters, 2009).…”