1998
DOI: 10.1136/adc.78.1.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence of protective immunity after postexposure prophylaxis of varicella with oral aciclovir in the family setting

Abstract: The persistence of protective immunity after postexposure prophylaxis against varicella using oral aciclovir was evaluated in the family setting. Sixty one of 78 recipients of oral aciclovir were assessed by questionnaire, and 13 of 61 were evaluated for serum antibody to varicella zoster virus (VZV) using the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen method. The observation period ranged from 33 to 50 months. None of those (n = 44) who had initially seroconverted to VZV after aciclovir prophylaxis developed br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies revealed that the use of aciclovir prophylaxis in immunocompetent children exposed to a household contact with active varicella significantly decreased the transmission rate of VZV [27][28][29]. Most important for cases of reexposure, these children developed subclinical infection with a prolonged humoral immunity against VZV [29].…”
Section: Immunocompetent Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies revealed that the use of aciclovir prophylaxis in immunocompetent children exposed to a household contact with active varicella significantly decreased the transmission rate of VZV [27][28][29]. Most important for cases of reexposure, these children developed subclinical infection with a prolonged humoral immunity against VZV [29].…”
Section: Immunocompetent Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If prophylaxis is delayed until day 11, varicella is not prevented, perhaps because viral replication rate and viraemia is past its peak by then 14. Studies suggest that aciclovir interferes with viral replication sufficiently to suppress clinical disease while still allowing effective immunity to develop 1517. Many departments have already changed their practice and now use aciclovir instead of VZIG 18.…”
Section: Antiviral Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norsk barnelegeforening anbefaler en profylaksevarighet på 14 dager fra dag 7 (12). Det er viktig å sjekke immunstatus etter profylakse for å undersøke om pasienten trenger vaksinasjon (18,31). Hvorvidt immunresponsen etter en subklinisk infeksjon i forbindelse med aciklovirprofylakse er nok til å beskytte mot senere infeksjoner og utvikling av zoster, er ikke godt nok studert.…”
Section: Rammeunclassified
“…Hvorvidt immunresponsen etter en subklinisk infeksjon i forbindelse med aciklovirprofylakse er nok til å beskytte mot senere infeksjoner og utvikling av zoster, er ikke godt nok studert. Små observasjonsstudier tyder på at immuniteten holder seg i alle fall i 2 1 /2-3 år hos friske barn (18,31).…”
Section: Rammeunclassified