2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent high hatchery recruitment despite advanced reoligotrophication and significant natural spawning in a whitefish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively low proportion of stocked whitefish of one cohort, as we found for Lake Constance with 17.4% for the 2016 cohort and 24.5% for the 2018 cohort, has also been reported for other lakes in the alpine region (Meng et al, 1986; Müller, 1990) and elsewhere (Salojärvi, 1992; Wanke et al, 2016). Most of the time, natural recruitment occurred in those lakes and several authors argue that stocking is superfluous under these conditions (Gerdeaux, 2004) or that stocked fish only survive in high numbers if natural recruitment is deficient (Wanke et al, 2016; Wedekind et al, 2022). Based on these results and the fact that natural born offspring seem to dominate the whitefish cohorts in Lake Constance, higher proportions of stocked fish in the future are unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A relatively low proportion of stocked whitefish of one cohort, as we found for Lake Constance with 17.4% for the 2016 cohort and 24.5% for the 2018 cohort, has also been reported for other lakes in the alpine region (Meng et al, 1986; Müller, 1990) and elsewhere (Salojärvi, 1992; Wanke et al, 2016). Most of the time, natural recruitment occurred in those lakes and several authors argue that stocking is superfluous under these conditions (Gerdeaux, 2004) or that stocked fish only survive in high numbers if natural recruitment is deficient (Wanke et al, 2016; Wedekind et al, 2022). Based on these results and the fact that natural born offspring seem to dominate the whitefish cohorts in Lake Constance, higher proportions of stocked fish in the future are unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these stocking programs are intended to support local whitefish populations to compensate for a shortfall in natural recruitment or to stabilize fluctuating fishery yield by reducing annual variation in cohort size (Eckmann et al, 1988). Many previous evaluations of effects of larval stocking on yield or year‐class strength in fisheries around the world have found variable effects, with some showing little or no effect (Salojärvi, 1992; Wanke et al, 2017), others showing negative effects (Anneville et al, 2015), and others showing increased harvest (Anneville et al, 2009; Wanke et al, 2016; Wedekind et al, 2022). Furthermore, the impact of stocking programs can vary over time, as in Lake Geneva, where whitefish abundance and fishery yield both increased over the first 10 years of stocking, but subsequent increased fishery yield was mostly driven by increased recruitment resulting from improved limnological conditions (Anneville et al, 2009; Gerdeaux, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise role of stocking in landings was not assessed in the studied lakes except in Lake Bourget (Champigneulle and Cachera, 2008), where it did not exceed 15% of the landings. Future studies requiring marking of hatchery fish (Eckmann, 2003) will address stocking efficiency, which is believed to be lake-specific as recent studies in other European lakes have sometimes reported high contributions of whitefish stocking even after re-oligotrophication (Eckmann et al, 2007;Wanke et al, 2016;Wedekind et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%