2017
DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.s1.s9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent lingual paresthesia caused by a displaced tooth fragment: a case report and literature review

Abstract: Accidental displacement of the third molar tooth or its fragment into the anatomical spaces is a rare but potentially serious complication. The most common sites of mandibular third molar displacement are the sublingual, submandibular, and pterygomandibular spaces. Removal of a displaced tooth or its fragments from these spaces may be difficult due to poor access and the vital structures involved in these spaces; therefore, removal may result in permanent damage. This article is intended to provide a concise u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The submandibular displacement of a tooth may be accompanied by swelling, pain, limited mandibular movements, severe tissue damage, psychological distress, and medico-legal issues (8,41,42). It could be associated with permanent or transient neurologic damages to lingual nerve with paraesthesia of the lateral region of the tongue, numbness, intense pain, burning tongue and taste impairment (39,42). A case of submasseteric abscess occurred after 1 month from a submandibular displacement of an impacted lower third molar was also reported (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The submandibular displacement of a tooth may be accompanied by swelling, pain, limited mandibular movements, severe tissue damage, psychological distress, and medico-legal issues (8,41,42). It could be associated with permanent or transient neurologic damages to lingual nerve with paraesthesia of the lateral region of the tongue, numbness, intense pain, burning tongue and taste impairment (39,42). A case of submasseteric abscess occurred after 1 month from a submandibular displacement of an impacted lower third molar was also reported (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper use of surgical instrumentation, extractive forces, with a exhaustive knowledge of the anatomical structures provided by a panoramic radiography and CT scans may prevent the iatrogenic displacement (37,41). Intraoral or extraoral finger pressure is considered useful in avoiding ligual cortex leakage and it could also aid the operator in finding and directing the displaced tooth to the way out (39,40,42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only three reported cases that the patient had a lingual nerve paresthesia with the displacement of the tooth fragment before retrieval including our case 7 [3,20]. Although those might be caused by wisdom tooth removal procedure itself, the common important findings in the three cases in CT images were that the lingual plate fracture was observed above the mylohyoid line (this means displacement happened in the sublingual space initially), and the fragment was detected at the level of or below the mylohyoid line.…”
Section: Lingual Nerve Paresthesia Due To Displacementmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Of these, displacement into the submandibular space is the most common [2]. Since Doran 4 reported the first case of the displacement into the floor of the mouth, in fact, not so many cases have been reported in English literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. It seems like the displacement of the tooth is a rare entity due to the small number of reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8 Prior to performing retrieval, the tooth should be localised with at least a onedimensional image, 14 such as panoramic, postero-anterior, submento-vertex and occlusal views, in addition to image intensifiers. [10][11][12]18 Computed Tomography (CT) or Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is desirable due to exact localisation and is indicated when plain film imaging is not conclusive. 4,5,[7][8][9][10]12,16,19 CBCT is preferable to a standard CT due to its lower radiation dose as compared with a standard CT. 3,12,19 However, choice will be partly dependant on the availability of such modalities within the particular secondary care setting.…”
Section: Special Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%