2018
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person-based differences in pay reactions: A compensation-activation theory and integrative conceptual review.

Abstract: Compensation research has focused traditionally on how pay design characteristics (e.g., pay level, individual or group incentives) relate to average employee outcomes and, in toto, on how these outcomes affect organizational performance. Recently, scholars have begun to pay more attention to how individuals vary in the strength of their reactions to pay. Empirical research in several disciplines examines how the interplay of pay systems and person-based characteristics (psychological individual differences, d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, this research contributes to the reward-creativity debate by identifying the cultural value of collectivism as a vital individual difference and an attribute that can shape the relationship between PFIP and employee creativity in the organizational context. Our findings also provide empirical evidence for CAT (Fulmer & Shaw, 2018), suggesting that employees with different cultural values make sense of and respond to the situational cues created by PFIP in different ways. Furthermore, our research findings concerning the moderating effects of vertical and horizontal collectivist orientations provide a microperspective for understanding the influence of individual cultural values on the effectiveness of organizational pay practices (Gerhart & Fang, 2014;Kim, Wang, Chen, Zhu, & Sun, 2019;Sanders et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In total, this research contributes to the reward-creativity debate by identifying the cultural value of collectivism as a vital individual difference and an attribute that can shape the relationship between PFIP and employee creativity in the organizational context. Our findings also provide empirical evidence for CAT (Fulmer & Shaw, 2018), suggesting that employees with different cultural values make sense of and respond to the situational cues created by PFIP in different ways. Furthermore, our research findings concerning the moderating effects of vertical and horizontal collectivist orientations provide a microperspective for understanding the influence of individual cultural values on the effectiveness of organizational pay practices (Gerhart & Fang, 2014;Kim, Wang, Chen, Zhu, & Sun, 2019;Sanders et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The CAT recently developed by Fulmer and Shaw (2018) provides a microlens through which one can observe how individuals differ in their psychological reactions to pay system attributes. The central tenet of CAT is that the motivational strength of pay systems depends on the extent to which the situational cues embedded within a particular pay practice fit individuals' fundamental social motives (e.g., selfprotection, affiliation, and status seeking).…”
Section: Intrinsic Motivation As a Crucial Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is important for compensation research as it creates new knowledge about which employees are attracted by different pay procedures and how individuals vary in their feelings towards pay (cf. Fulmer and Shaw, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the research will enrich the extant pay satisfaction literature by including the concept of work orientation. This is relevant for compensation research, which has shown increasing interest in how individuals' reactions to pay vary as part of the interplay between pay systems and personal characteristics (Fulmer and Shaw, 2018). This paper studies adults working in the public sector in Finland -a genderequal country-which, however, has a persistent gender pay gap (World Economic Forum, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%