1995
DOI: 10.1109/34.464560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Person identification using multiple cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
234
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 498 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
234
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brunelli and Falavigna [9] propose two different methods for combining ÿve opinions. Since the source of the opinions (scores, in the author's terminology) are fairly di erent (two speech features and three image features) a common reference framework is needed prior to fusion.…”
Section: Multimodal Bissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunelli and Falavigna [9] propose two different methods for combining ÿve opinions. Since the source of the opinions (scores, in the author's terminology) are fairly di erent (two speech features and three image features) a common reference framework is needed prior to fusion.…”
Section: Multimodal Bissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are global-learning-global-decision (GG) (Brunelli and Falavigna, 1995;Bigun et al, 1997;Kittler et al, 1998;Hong and Jain, 1998;Ben-Yacoub et al, 1999;Chatzis et al, 1999;Verlinde et al, 2000), local-learning-globaldecision (LG) (Jain and Ross, 2002;Kumar and Zhang, 2003;Indovina et al, 2003;Fierrez-Aguilar et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2004;Toh et al, 2004;Poh and Bengio, 2005), and similarly global-learninglocal-decision (GL) (Jain and Ross, 2002;Toh et al, 2004), and local-learninglocal-decision (LL) (Toh et al, 2004). In the present work we adhere to this taxonomy and extend it by incorporating new items: adapted-learning and adapted-decisions.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common practice in most of the reported works on multimodal biometrics is to combine the matching scores obtained from the unimodal systems by using simple rules (e.g., sum, product), statistical methods, or machine learning procedures (Brunelli and Falavigna, 1995;Bigun et al, 1997;Kittler et al, 1998;Hong and Jain, 1998;Ben-Yacoub et al, 1999;Chatzis et al, 1999;Verlinde et al, 2000). A remarkable characteristic of this approach, as compared to the feature-level combination techniques, is the possibility of designing structured multimodal systems by using existing unimodal recognition strategies (Maltoni et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To combine the local matching scores into an overall decision, a common approach is to use a pre-defined voting space (e.g. [16][17][18][19][20][21]). This approach works for matched training and testing, but less so for the presence of mismatches between the training and testing features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%