1974
DOI: 10.2307/2786470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Space and Stimulus Intensity at a Southern California Amusement Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Nesbitt and Steven (1974) form an exception: here the men took the initiative. Their data, however, were collected in an amusement park, where a woman without company is quickly perceived as looking for company; for men this can be a reason to seek further contact, to which a smaller interpersonal distance may be the first step.…”
Section: Personal Spacementioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Nesbitt and Steven (1974) form an exception: here the men took the initiative. Their data, however, were collected in an amusement park, where a woman without company is quickly perceived as looking for company; for men this can be a reason to seek further contact, to which a smaller interpersonal distance may be the first step.…”
Section: Personal Spacementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Unobtrusive observation: the results of Baxter (1970)*, Nesbitt and Steven (1974), Smith (1981)* in Germany, andThomas (1973)* suggest that in male-female interactions the interpersonal distance is smaller than in female-female interactions. The results of Nesbitt and Steven need some further elaboration considering the unusual setting in which the research was carried out, namely, at night in an amusement park.…”
Section: Personal Spacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…A third item, which actually had the highest correlation with item 55, is less obviously related to social distancing (“Knows when he or she is talking too loud or making too much noise”). However, one’s sense of space is a multimodal construct and can be violated by a number of sensory modalities [4], [20], including audition (e.g., talking too loud in a public area). Thus, it is not surprising that an individual that violates the space of another person tends to do so through more than one sensory modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ekman and Friesen's (1969) leakage hypothesis suggests that emotional arousal "leaks" from less controllable channels (e.g., limbs and body). Indicators of negative arousal include increased distance, gaze aversion, postural rigidity and closedness, more postural shifts, and random kinesic movements (Burgoon & Koper, 1984; Cappella & Greene, 1984; Nesbitt & Steven, 1974). Cappella and Greene (1984) also found that louder volume, more nervous vocalizations, faster speech rate, and higher pitch are indicative of negative arousal states.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 94%