This commentary examines the intrinsic social dilemmas that present themselves in the face of pandemics and pandemic planning that are often highlighted through differential patterns of risk across a population. Specifically, we focus on the invisibility of what has become an essential labour force in many healthcare systems around the globepersonal support workers (PSWs). This article is informed by earlier analyses regarding sociality and risk: in 2012, we wrote an article in Sociology of Health and Illness about the gendered dynamics of frontline care-giving in relation to increased risk of infection during the 1918 influenza pandemic. That piece, entitled 'If you have a soul, you will volunteer at once: gendered expectations of duty to care during a pandemic' used newspaper and archival material from Brantford, Ontario a small Canadian city to explore the moral obligations placed upon women to provide frontline care and as a result women were at heightened risk given their increased exposure to disease. Understanding dynamics of care-giving in the 1918 influenza pandemic helped us illuminate gendered patterns of labour propagated through the language of moral responsibility that then became inequitably expressed on and through the bodily dynamics of disease transmission for nurses, other women who were called on to participate in nursing, and the families of these individuals (Godderis and Rossiter 2012). Returning to this analysis in light of COVID-19, and using similar data sources such as newspapers and organisational websites, we argue that the sustained and stubborn invisibility of particular caregivers is an important and telling pattern regarding care-giving and risk. Specifically, we examine the work and conditions of PSWsa form of labour that did not exist in 1918to examine gendered dynamics of risk that have emerged during COVID-19. PSWs, who may be known by a range of titles such as 'healthcare aides' or 'nursing assistants', are common in countries such as Canada, Denmark, Australia, the UK and the United States (Zagrodney and Saks 2017). These healthcare workers engage in a variety of care-related task within personal homes and 'hybrid' healthcare facilities such as long-term care residences and may be hired privately or employed by an organisation (Lilly 2008). As discussed in further detail below, we maintain that ancillary healthcare worker invisibility is deeply tied to larger structural forces that shape the very meaning of who counts in calculations of risk, and whose labour is essential for the system but is so unseen as to not even be factored into these calculations. Indeed, we echo Einboden's (2020) assertion that 'public responses to COVID-19 are reproducing neoliberal rationales about what bodies matter' and that '[t]he virus shows the limits of biomedicine and the fragility of the for-profit orientation of healthcare systems'. (4).