2020
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality Across the Lifespan

Abstract: Abstract. Personality is a relevant predictor for important life outcomes across the entire lifespan. Although previous studies have suggested the comparability of the measurement of the Big Five personality traits across adulthood, the generalizability to childhood is largely unknown. The present study investigated the structure of the Big Five personality traits assessed with the Big Five Inventory-SOEP Version (BFI-S; SOEP = Socio-Economic Panel) across a broad age range spanning 11–84 years. We used two sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to examine whether these results are replicable using two large and fully representative cross-sectional samples of 6th and 9th graders in Berlin, Germany. Targeting 6th graders offered an advantage in that this grade constitutes the last year of primary school education in Berlin and previous research has provided evidence for the replicability of personality self-ratings in 12 year olds (Allik et al, 2004;Brandt et al, 2018). Targeting 9th graders offered the advantage that students had already spent three years in Berlin's secondary education system, so potential effects of secondary school environments should be more pronounced than in lower grades.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aimed to examine whether these results are replicable using two large and fully representative cross-sectional samples of 6th and 9th graders in Berlin, Germany. Targeting 6th graders offered an advantage in that this grade constitutes the last year of primary school education in Berlin and previous research has provided evidence for the replicability of personality self-ratings in 12 year olds (Allik et al, 2004;Brandt et al, 2018). Targeting 9th graders offered the advantage that students had already spent three years in Berlin's secondary education system, so potential effects of secondary school environments should be more pronounced than in lower grades.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most prominent and frequently applied conceptualization of personality is the fivefactor model (or Big Five), which distinguishes five broad domains of individual differences: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness (McCrae & Costa, 1997). Research has provided evidence for their replicability across different ages, even in childhood and adolescence (Allik, Laidra, Realo, & Pullmann, 2004;Brandt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Personality and Academic Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'I keep my workplace tidy') will only be relevant for participants that are part of the work force. The importance of measurement invariance across age in personality development research has received more attention in recent years (Allemand et al, 2008(Allemand et al, , 2007Brandt et al, 2018;Nye et al, 2016;Olaru et al, 2018;Small, Hertzog, Hultsch, & Dixon, 2003). Because the number of observations per year of age is often too small to estimate MGCFA for singular age points, participants are often grouped to larger units (e.g.…”
Section: Person Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gender and age) is referred to as measurement invariance and can be examined with different statistical methods (Mellenbergh, 1989;Meredith, 1993;Millsap, 2012). Cross-sectional personality development studies that test for measurement invariance across age (Allemand, Zimprich, & Hendriks, 2008;Allemand, Zimprich, & Hertzog, 2007;Brandt et al, 2018;Nye, Allemand, Gosling, Potter, & Roberts, 2016;Olaru et al, 2018) usually examine measurement invariance across age groups by artificially categorizing age in an arbitrary number of groups after separating them based on equally arbitrary thresholds, even though age is continuous in nature. This approach and the associated decisions concerning number of groups, for example, will inevitably influence the results and can therefore provide us with a distorted picture of personality development (Hildebrandt, Lüdtke, Robitzsch, Sommer, & Wilhelm, 2016;Hildebrandt, Wilhelm, & Robitzsch, 2009;MacCallum, Zhang, Preacher, & Rucker, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI refers to the equivalence of factor loadings, item intercepts, and item residuals across groups of people: in the case of ageing research, across the age of participants. This constraint ensures that the extracted factors and factor parameters are comparable across age, which is essential when studying ageassociated differences in the latent traits (Allemand et al, 2007;Brandt et al, 2018;Nye et al, 2016). A lack of MI can severely bias the findings on developmental trends (e.g., Chen, 2007).…”
Section: Considerations When Developing Short Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%