1989
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and conditioning: A test of four models.

Abstract: Fbur experiments were conducted to test hypotheses derived from 4 alternative models of individual differences in instrumental conditioning. A standard go-no-go discrimination learning task was used in each of the 4 experiments. The results indicate that individual differences in performance of this discrimination are more consistently and strongly associated with impulsivity and anxiety than with extraversion and neuroticism. In each of the experiments, high anxiety hindered the learning of a go-no-go discrim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…non-arousing) unconditioned stimulus (Eysenck, 1967;Matthews & Gilliland, 1999;Zinbarg & Revelle, 1989). Under these conditions introverts are, theoretically, performing at the peak of the Yerkes-Dodson inverted U shaped curve; the optimal level of arousal for learning (Eysenck, 1967).…”
Section: Influence Of Personality On Observational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-arousing) unconditioned stimulus (Eysenck, 1967;Matthews & Gilliland, 1999;Zinbarg & Revelle, 1989). Under these conditions introverts are, theoretically, performing at the peak of the Yerkes-Dodson inverted U shaped curve; the optimal level of arousal for learning (Eysenck, 1967).…”
Section: Influence Of Personality On Observational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the hypothesis that individuals high in neuroticism would be more susceptible to anxiety than individuals low in neuroticism (e.g., Eysenck & Eysenck, 1985;Eysenck, 1987;Gray, 1981Gray, , 1987Zinbarg & Revelle, 1989).…”
Section: Extraversionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Furthermore, researchers such as Eysenck, Gray, and others have hypothesized that individuals low in extraversion may be more susceptible to anxiety than individuals high in extraversion (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1985;Eysenck, MacLeod, & Mathews, 1987;Gray, 1981Gray, , 1987Zinbarg & Revelle, 1989). This research posited that people who are low in extraversion experience a greater level of susceptibility to punishment cues and are prone to greater arousal from those punishment cues.…”
Section: Extraversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, associations between variation in reactivity to secondary aversive cues and anxiety have proved relatively easy to confirm. However, like other investigators (e.g., Zinbarg & Revelle 1989), we have found numerous significant associations between positive incentive motivation and personality, indicating that incentive motivation and personality are indeed related, albeit seemingly in a highly complex manner.…”
Section: Does Extraversion Predict Positive Incentive Motivation?mentioning
confidence: 46%