Personality profile and depression in migraine: a meta-analysis

Garramone, Federica; Baiano, Chiara; Russo, Antonio; D’Iorio, Alfonsina; Tedeschi, Gioacchino; Trojano, Luigi; Santangelo, Gabriella

doi:10.1007/s10072-019-04174-x

Cited by 24 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Caregivers' extraversion was only negatively correlated with their own depression. Studies have reported that extraverted caregivers were more likely to pursue social interactions and acquire social support from the outside, thereby experiencing more positive affect and fewer depression symptoms (Garramone et al, 2020;Gogas et al, 2017). Whereas, this study unexpectedly found that caregivers' extraversion was positively associated with patients' depression.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 62%

The dyadic effects of personality traits on depression in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: The mediating role of acceptance of illness

Wang

Sun

Yang

et al. 2021

European J Cancer Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to explore the intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of three personality traits-neuroticism, extraversion and conscientiousness-on depression and examine whether acceptance of illness mediates the actor and partner effects in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model (APIMeM).Methods: A total of 304 dyads of advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers were studied. Personality traits, acceptance of illness and depression were measured using 44-item Big Five Inventory, the Acceptance of Illness (AIS) scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Results:The APIMeMs suggested that there were significant actor-actor effects of the three personality traits on depression through their own acceptance of illness.Additionally, significant actor-partner effects of neuroticism and extraversion on depression were also found. Specifically, patients' neuroticism was negatively related to their own acceptance of illness, which increased caregivers' depression, and caregivers' higher extraversion was related to their own higher acceptance of illness, which reduced patients' depression. Furthermore, a significant partner-actor effect was only found in the neuroticism model. Patients' neuroticism was negatively related to caregivers' acceptance of illness, which increased caregivers' depression. Conclusion:The three personality traits had both interpersonal and intrapersonal effects on depression in advanced lung cancer patient-caregiver dyads, and acceptance of illness played an important mediating role in these relationships.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 62%

The dyadic effects of personality traits on depression in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: The mediating role of acceptance of illness

Wang

Sun

Yang

et al. 2021

European J Cancer Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A recent meta-analysis on personality of migraine patients has shown higher risk for neuroticism and harm avoidance, and for low self-directedness and extraversion in migraineurs [31], which hypothetically may be involved in more pronounced reactive and anxious jealousy scores than preventive scores for MM patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Jealousy in women with migraine: a cross-sectional case-control study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Estrogen influences susceptibility to migraine attacks and it has been suggested to affect jealousy in romantic relationships in women. Therefore, we hypothesized that migraine women may be more jealous. Methods: Jealousy levels and hormonal status were determined based on a cross-sectional, web-based, questionnaire study among female migraine patients and controls. A random sample of participants was selected from a validated migraine database. Participants with a serious and intimate monogamous relationship were included (n = 498) and divided into the following subgroups: menstrual migraine (n = 167), non-menstrual migraine (n = 103), postmenopausal migraine (n = 117), and premenopausal (n = 57) and postmenopausal (n = 54) controls. The primary outcome was the difference in mean jealousy levels between patients with menstrual migraine, nonmenstrual migraine and premenopausal controls. Results were analyzed with a generalized linear model adjusting for age, relationship duration and hormonal status (including oral contraceptive use). Additionally, the difference in jealousy levels between postmenopausal migraine patients and controls was assessed. Previous research was replicated by evaluating the effect of combined oral contraceptives on jealousy. Results: Jealousy levels were higher in menstrual migraine patients compared to controls (mean difference ± SE: 3.87 ± 1.09, p = 0.001), and non-menstrual migraine patients compared to controls (4.98 ± 1.18, p < 0.001). No difference in jealousy was found between postmenopausal migraine patients and controls (− 0.32 ± 1.24, p = 0.798). Women using combined oral contraceptives were more jealous compared to non-users with a regular menstrual cycle (2.32 ± 1.03, p = 0.025). Conclusion: Young women with migraine are more jealous within a romantic partnership.

show abstract

“…There is evidence that suggests that headache sufferers exhibit higher anxiety and depression [80,81], and also sleep disturbances [82]. Furthermore, some primary headaches, e.g., migraine, are associated to specific personality traits, e.g., neuroticism [83]. These findings represent the rational basis for psychological management of headaches, particularly considering the complex relationship between mood disorders, sleep quality, burden, and hyperalgesic responses observed in patients with headache [84].…”

Section: Scientific Evidence Of Cognitive Interventions For Headachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Reasoning Behind Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Headaches: A Narrative Literature Review

Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas

Plaza-Manzano

Arias-Buría

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Headache is the clinical syndrome most commonly observed by neurologists in daily practice. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are commonly used for the management of headaches; however, the clinical reasoning behind these interventions is not properly applied. We conducted a narrative literature review using as data sources for academic PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, EBSCO, PEDro, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Collaboration Trials Register, and SCOPUS. This narrative literature review mainly considered systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised clinical trials, and expert opinions published after the year 2000 discussing clinical reasoning for application of non-pharmacological interventions in individuals with tension-type, migraine, and cervicogenic headaches. After the data extraction, we organized the literature thematically as follows: (1) mapping of theoretical aspects of non-pharmacological interventions; (2) summarizing most updated literature about effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions grouped by targeted tissue and headache; (3) identifying research gaps in the existing literature and proposing hypotheses for better understanding of current clinical reasoning. We found that there are many non-pharmacological treatment strategies used for headaches, including beyond the tissue-based impairment treatments (bottom-up) and strategies targeting the central nervous system (top down). Bottom-up strategies include joint-biased, soft-tissue biased, or needling interventions, whereas top-down strategies include exercise and cognitive interventions. Evidence shows that the effectiveness of these interventions depends on the application of proper clinical reasoning, since not all strategies are effective for all headaches. For instance, evidence of non-pharmacological interventions is more controversial for migraines than for tension-type or cervicogenic headaches, since migraine pathogenesis involves activation of sub-cortical structures and the trigemino- vascular system, whereas pathogenesis of tension-type or cervicogenic headaches is most associated to musculoskeletal impairments of the cervical spine. We conclude that current literature suggests that not all non-pharmacological interventions are effective for all headaches, and that multimodal, not isolated, approaches seem to be more effective for patients with headaches. Most published studies have reported small clinical effects in the short term. This narrative literature review provides some hypotheses for discrepancies in the available literature and future research. Clinical reasoning should be applied to better understand the effects of non-pharmacological interventions.

show abstract

Personality profile and depression in migraine: a meta-analysis

Cited by 24 publications

References 41 publications

The dyadic effects of personality traits on depression in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: The mediating role of acceptance of illness

The dyadic effects of personality traits on depression in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: The mediating role of acceptance of illness

Jealousy in women with migraine: a cross-sectional case-control study

Clinical Reasoning Behind Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Headaches: A Narrative Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About