2000
DOI: 10.1145/345124.345155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalization and privacy

Abstract: P Personalization and RIVACY Does personalization jeopardize our privacy? If so, what should the law do about it? P eople are constantly learning information about us. They see what we do, what we buy, what we look at, and the like. If they know who we are, and if they have enough financial incentive, they can record this information under our name. If we engage in computerized transactions with them, such recording becomes very easy, as does combining this information with still other information tied to our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the technology-related factors, prior Information System (IS) research also explores ethical issues related to personalization (Kramer et al, 2000;Stewart & Segars, 2002;Volokh, 2000). Users face a dilemma.…”
Section: Methodology and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the technology-related factors, prior Information System (IS) research also explores ethical issues related to personalization (Kramer et al, 2000;Stewart & Segars, 2002;Volokh, 2000). Users face a dilemma.…”
Section: Methodology and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two remarkable advantages on this. First, the user does not need to worry about the privacy infringement, which is a big concern for personalized search [26]. Second, both the computation of personalization and the storage of the user profile are done at the client side so that the server load is reduced dramatically [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this heightened information sharing often conflicts with consumers' desires to be shielded from unauthorized secondary use of their medical and banking records. Although many consumers believe we should have a legal right to privacy, consumers cannot rely on existing legislation for protection [21] nor can they reply on the privacy practices of professionals who play a significant role in the overall quality of data collected, accessed, or used to define service delivery.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%