Personalization of serious games for learning

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present principles for personalization of both learning content and gameplay in serious games for learning, which are based on a combined model of the student that comprises user, learner and player-related aspects of the student’s profile. Each of the considered user, learner and player sub-models has a static and dynamic group of characteristics. These characteristics assist general approaches for learning mazes game personalization applied to embedded mini-games (designed as information units, learning objects and educational tasks) so that to be adjustable and to enable learners to acquire knowledge more effectively. Design/methodology/approach A student modelling approach was applied to design the personalization of learning content in the educational maze game and each of them contained mini-games. To evaluate the student’s preferences about the types of mini-games and ways of their personalization depending on individual and group student characteristics, the authors conducted an online survey. Findings This study presents examples of personalization of four types of mini-games available in maze halls, namely, question, searching, arranging and action games. Next, the research discusses findings from an online survey aiming at the evaluation of the preferred types of mini-games and the way of their personalization. There are analysed results concerning the impact of the student model characteristics on the preferred ways of personalization in educational maze games, together with criteria for personalization of educational resources according to student’s level of knowledge, age, goals and learning style. Research limitations/implications A significant limitation of the research is the relatively small number of survey participants and the lack of studying the impact of learning and playing styles over game personalization. Another limitation of the study is the inclusion of only some of the mini-games within the demonstration maze, which respondents play before answering the survey questions. Originality/value This paper presents original research on the personalization of educational maze game based on a model of the student profile that comprises both static and dynamic properties reflecting user, learner and player-related aspects of the student character, together with results obtained from an online survey.

Investigating the Use of Serious Games for Cancer Control Among Children and Adolescents: Scoping Review

“…Users can also develop their skills in critical thinking, decision-making, problemsolving, social interaction, time management, and so on by actively exploring the serious game content in a safe environment without physical constraints [22][23][24][25]. Adaptive and personalized functions and immediate feedback offered by the game system also promote users' continuous learning cycles while retaining user engagement [26,27]. Previous literature has shown the effectiveness of serious games designed with diverse objectives, such as improving retention of knowledge [28], pain relief [29], and medication adherence [20] in the context of various diseases.…”

Personalised Learning through Context-Based Adaptation in the Serious Games with Gating Mechanism

“…Adaptation refers to the continuous adjustment of the game based on the user's actions and performance and the game's current state towards the desired state (Bontchev et al, 2021;Göbel & Wendel, 2016;Khudhair Abbas Ahmed, 2016;Paraschos & Koulouriotis, 2023;Zhu & Ontañón, 2020). Personalization in serious games can be established through adjustments in the game content and support adapted to a player's personal abilities or needs (Paraschos & Koulouriotis, 2023).…”

Guidelines of Serious Game Design for Promoting Reframing

“…Whilst there is no absolute agreement on a definition of serious games (SG), most scholars agree on a core meaning when the primary purpose of SGs is within education (Bontchev et al, 2021). In particular, when applications from relevant areas such as game-based learning (Deterding et al, 2011; Plass et al, 2015) are included rather than simply entertaining (Landers, 2014; Susi et al, 2007; Michael & Chen, 2005).…”