2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized brain network models for assessing structure–function relationships

Abstract: Many recent efforts in computational modeling of macro-scale brain dynamics have begun to take a data-driven approach by incorporating structural and/or functional information derived from subject data. Here, we discuss recent work using personalized brain network models to study structure-function relationships in human brains. We describe the steps necessary to build such models and show how this computational approach can provide previously unobtainable information through the ability to perform virtual exp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One obvious limitation of the current research design is that the data were collected from a single participant, which makes it impossible to examine potential individual differences in our findings. However, although research in cognitive neuroscience typically collects data from multiple participants, for the majority of studies, their main focus is on the aggregated pattern of the brain activation/connectivity (but see person-centered research, e.g., (25)), and individual differences have been typically treated as random noise (sampling error). Therefore, in our view, this limitation is superseded by the strength of the current design: sensitivity to the nuanced intra-individual changes in brain signals and functional connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One obvious limitation of the current research design is that the data were collected from a single participant, which makes it impossible to examine potential individual differences in our findings. However, although research in cognitive neuroscience typically collects data from multiple participants, for the majority of studies, their main focus is on the aggregated pattern of the brain activation/connectivity (but see person-centered research, e.g., (25)), and individual differences have been typically treated as random noise (sampling error). Therefore, in our view, this limitation is superseded by the strength of the current design: sensitivity to the nuanced intra-individual changes in brain signals and functional connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inter-individual aggregation approach is useful to examine the effects of meditation averaged across participants. However, given the large individual differences in the whole-brain functional connectivity pattern (25,26), there is danger that the approach potentially masks important intra-individual changes in the composition of the brain networks (e.g., some participant-specific network structures may be canceled out by inter-individual aggregation). Therefore, adopting a design that allows us to focus on the intra-individual change may provide novel insights into how mindfulness meditation alters the structure of the brain networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the critical features of pathological networks can be effectively captured in computational models, they can be used for diagnosis and delivery of personalized therapeutic weak electric fields (Figure 1). Multiple studies in theoretical and computational neuroscience have developed whole-brain network models [38][39][40][41] to explore the relationship between brain function and its underlying connectivity. This increased interest in finding the origin of the structure-function relationship has led to a newly developing field known as network neuroscience (Bassett and Sporns, 2017) [42] that relies on graph theory to study the brain across its multiple scales and complexities.…”
Section: Tcs and Brain Network: From Biophysics To Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inter-individual aggregation approach is useful to examine the effects of meditation averaged across participants. However, given the large individual differences in the whole-brain functional connectivity patterns 24 , 25 , there is danger that the approach potentially masks important intra-individual changes in the composition of the brain networks (e.g., some participant-specific network architectures may be canceled out by inter-individual aggregation). Therefore, adopting a design that allows us to focus on the intra-individual change may provide novel insights into how meditation alters the architecture of the brain networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%