2015
DOI: 10.1147/jrd.2015.2456711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Learning Pathways: Enabling intervention creation and tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main consideration is that learners can choose their preferred framework, instructivist or connectivist, at any point in the course (Crosslin & Dellinger, 2015). This is an expansion of the recent work in personalized learning that allows learners to choose their learning pathway rather than the instructor (Reddy et al, 2015) or technology (Lin, Yeh, Hung, & Chang, 2013). The second consideration was that the transition between these frameworks would be well described in a visual syllabus and supported through various centralized and distributed technologies and digital spaces (Crosslin & Dellinger, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main consideration is that learners can choose their preferred framework, instructivist or connectivist, at any point in the course (Crosslin & Dellinger, 2015). This is an expansion of the recent work in personalized learning that allows learners to choose their learning pathway rather than the instructor (Reddy et al, 2015) or technology (Lin, Yeh, Hung, & Chang, 2013). The second consideration was that the transition between these frameworks would be well described in a visual syllabus and supported through various centralized and distributed technologies and digital spaces (Crosslin & Dellinger, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The district served a diverse student population with varying learning needs and abilities, making it challenging for educators to provide individualized instruction effectively. To address this challenge, the district adopted a data dashboard that integrated student performance data from assessments, attendance records, and behavioral indicators (Molenaar, et al, 2020;Reddy, et al, 2015).…”
Section: Case Study 1: Personalizing Learning Paths With Data Dashboardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recreational video-gamers may come to the university, like the athletes, having study behavioral weaknesses because of their former gaming and study practices. Frequently, these video-gaming students are left on their own to find academic learning supports, as they may have no ties to a formal campus extracurricular group of teammates or coach to assist them with their personal accountability (Manero et al, 2017;Popescu & Ghita, 2013;Quinton, 2016;Reddy et al, 2015). The recreational video-gaming students do not have activities like mandatory team study halls, regular grade checks, or eligibility rules to keep them focused and in check (Aquino, 2011;Cheslock et al, 2016;Quinton, 2016;Seow & Pan, 2014).…”
Section: Significance Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%