2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized mental stress detection with self-organizing map: From laboratory to the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results reported by Schmidt et al in either the single or multi modality case are lower than the performance of our proposed CNN models (78% F1-score) and the gradient tree boosting algorithm (79% F1score). In addition, the other methods that are evaluated on the WESAD dataset with LOOCV reported lower F1-scores [34], [35]. Tervonen et al [34] proposed a binary stress classification using the self-organizing map with different personalized levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results reported by Schmidt et al in either the single or multi modality case are lower than the performance of our proposed CNN models (78% F1-score) and the gradient tree boosting algorithm (79% F1score). In addition, the other methods that are evaluated on the WESAD dataset with LOOCV reported lower F1-scores [34], [35]. Tervonen et al [34] proposed a binary stress classification using the self-organizing map with different personalized levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the other methods that are evaluated on the WESAD dataset with LOOCV reported lower F1-scores [34], [35]. Tervonen et al [34] proposed a binary stress classification using the self-organizing map with different personalized levels. F1-score of their semi-personal model evaluated using LOOCV on a field dataset was 62%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features were normalized using within-subject standardization, meaning that each feature was transformed by subtracting its mean and dividing by its standard deviation separately for each participant. Person-specific standardization was conducted instead of person-independent standardization, since it has shown improved performance in earlier work in similar contexts [14,20,37].…”
Section: Data Preprocessing Segmentation and Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have collected behavioral data from computer, keystroke, and mouse dynamics such as interaction time, typing pressure, and mouse clicking, but mostly under laboratory conditions [21][22][23][24][25]. The majority of real-life stress-detection studies have been based on behavioral data gathered from smartphones [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The behavioral data collection approaches are convenient because they do not require any additional gadgets, but using data from personal devices can pose privacy concerns.…”
Section: Unobtrusive Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%