2017
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202015.0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized treatment for longitudinal data using unspecified random-effects model

Abstract: We develop new modeling for personalized treatment for longitudinal studies involving high heterogeneity of treatment effects. Incorporating subjectspecific information into the treatment assignment is crucial since different individuals can react to the same treatment very differently. We estimate unobserved subject-specific treatment effects through conditional random-effects modeling, and apply the random forest algorithm to allocate effective treatments for individuals. The advantage of our approach is tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the nonignorable missing data framework, the consistency property holds as long as either the SPM or the CMAR assumption is satisfied. The proof is quite similar to Cho, Wang and Qu (2016), and is omitted here. One notable condition is the L 2 -mixingale condition (McLeish (1975)) that controls the serial correlation Cor(y i |b i ) to achieve consistency, Cor(y it , y i,t+s ) should be sufficiently small with an increase of s.…”
Section: Asymptotic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the nonignorable missing data framework, the consistency property holds as long as either the SPM or the CMAR assumption is satisfied. The proof is quite similar to Cho, Wang and Qu (2016), and is omitted here. One notable condition is the L 2 -mixingale condition (McLeish (1975)) that controls the serial correlation Cor(y i |b i ) to achieve consistency, Cor(y it , y i,t+s ) should be sufficiently small with an increase of s.…”
Section: Asymptotic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Remark 1. Given β 0 or its consistent estimatorβ, the penalized random-effects estimatorb is consistent as the cluster size T goes to infinity, as discussed in Cho, Wang and Qu (2016), given that regularity conditions are satisfied. Under the nonignorable missing data framework, the consistency property holds as long as either the SPM or the CMAR assumption is satisfied.…”
Section: Asymptotic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their method takes serial correlation into account only for the fixed-effects parameter estimations. Cho et al [15] indicate that incorporating serial correlation is also crucial for random-effects estimation, especially if the random-effects prediction is the main focus. To allocate accurate dosage for each individual, it is important to obtain accurate estimations for both fixed and random effects.…”
Section: Estimation Of Population Parameters On Training Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason we include (6) is to control the variance and ensure the identifiability of the random-effects estimation, and therefore, the iterative algorithm converges. Cho et al [15] show that the choice of 2 is not sensitive for parameter estimation and can be fixed as 2 = log(N), while 1 can be selected through cross-validation. Here, we fix 1 = log(n 0 ) and 2 = log(N) for simplification, which works well in simulation studies.…”
Section: Estimation Of Population Parameters On Training Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diaz et al, adopted a random intercept linear model for the log of trough‐plasma‐concentration to determine the optimal dosage. Cho et al estimated unobserved subject‐specific treatment effects through conditional random‐effects modeling and applied the random forest algorithm to allocate effective treatments for individuals. Zhu and Qu personalized drug dosage over time under the framework of a log‐linear mixed‐effect model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%