2020
DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives from Ten Years of Protist Studies by High‐Throughput Metabarcoding

Abstract: During the last decade, high‐throughput metabarcoding became routine for analyzing protistan diversity and distributions in nature. Amid a multitude of exciting findings, scientists have also identified and addressed technical and biological limitations, although problems still exist for inference of meaningful taxonomic and ecological knowledge based on short DNA sequences. Given the extensive use of this approach, it is critical to settle our understanding on its strengths and weaknesses and to synthesize up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental high-throughput sequencing (HTS) studies of protists have now been performed for over a decade (Santoferrara et al 2020). During that time, a large diversity of dinophyte DNA sequences has also been uncovered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental high-throughput sequencing (HTS) studies of protists have now been performed for over a decade (Santoferrara et al 2020). During that time, a large diversity of dinophyte DNA sequences has also been uncovered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, more investigations employing laboratory observations and visualisation (e.g., the development of fluorescent in situ hybridisation probes) are needed to confirm the nature of the interaction between foraminifera and the Group I Syndiniales (Santoferrara et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different timescales can be investigated on between-and within-OTU levels: phylogenetic trees of the representative amplicon sequences (between-OTU level) visualize comparatively older processes (e.g., past effective dispersal and speciation events), whereas the internal network structure of Swarm OTUs (within-OTU level) may display more recent divergences on subspecies level. Albeit we are pretty sure to have ascertained genetic differentiations that evolved on different time scales, the distinction between intra-and interspecific sequence deviations remains blurry (Santoferrara et al, 2020).…”
Section: Considerations For Innovative Pattern Inference On Between-amentioning
confidence: 99%