2010
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2010.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on inhibiting mTOR as a future treatment strategy for hematological malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 At present, the new frontier of mTOR inhibition is represented by the use of active site mTOR inhibitors, which target both mTORC1 and mTORC2, without affecting PI3K activity. 9 Accordingly, in our current study we tested the anti-leukemic activity of three compounds that directly target the mTOR catalytic domain. Two of these compounds (PP-242 and OSI-027) have already been tested in other hematological cancers, including Philadelphia þ acute leukemias 39,40 and multiple myeloma, 41 and promising preclinical data were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 At present, the new frontier of mTOR inhibition is represented by the use of active site mTOR inhibitors, which target both mTORC1 and mTORC2, without affecting PI3K activity. 9 Accordingly, in our current study we tested the anti-leukemic activity of three compounds that directly target the mTOR catalytic domain. Two of these compounds (PP-242 and OSI-027) have already been tested in other hematological cancers, including Philadelphia þ acute leukemias 39,40 and multiple myeloma, 41 and promising preclinical data were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 mTORC2 is usually considered to be rapamycin resistant. 9 Both mTORC1 and mTORC2 are activated in most of T-ALL patients underscoring these complexes as major targets for T-ALL treatment. 10 mTORC1/mTORC2 activation in T-ALL usually depends on upregulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt axis, which is a common event in T-ALL patients 11 and has a negative impact on prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, targeting mTOR more globally is becoming an important therapeutic option in AML therapy. 139,[143][144][145][146][147] Studies by other investigators performing high-throughput screening assays have identified 4EGI-1, which is a 4E-BP1 mimetic and a potent inhibitor of the interactions between eIF4E and eIF4G. The inhibitor 4EGI-1 has been shown in some systems to inhibit the growth of BCR-ABL-transformed Ba/F3 hematopoietic cells, but not the parental interleukin-3-dependent cells line (Ba/F3).…”
Section: Pi3k/pten/akt/mtor Drug Resistance and Leukemia Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 mTORC2, defined by the interaction between mTOR and Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), is considered to be rapamycin resistant and phosphorylates Akt at Ser 473, one of two phosphorylated residues required for full Akt activation. 10 Upregulated mTORC1 activity within cancer cells increases the synthesis of many oncogenic proteins controlled at the translation initiation level, through the phosphorylation of the physiologic translation repressor 4E-BP1 at multiple residues. 11, 12 An important regulator of the mTORC1-dependent translation process is the liver kinase B1 (LKB1)/AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%