2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00305.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on the Past: A Study of the Spatial Perspectival Characteristics of Recollective Memories

Abstract: The following paper considers one important feature of our experiential or ' recollective ' memories, namely their spatial perspectival characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not, in particular, begin to explore the importance of the flipping of perspectives, a topic of increasing current interest (Rice and Rubin 2009), or to construct a positive account of observer perspectives in personal memory and their significance. Here I argue that observer memories are genuine cases of remembering, analyzing the puzzling neglect of observer memories in Richard Wollheim's treatment of a range of closely related phenomena, and extending one of the few more recent philosophical treatments of the topic to date by Debus (2007). One might accept my case to that point, yet think that a field or 'own-eyes' visuospatial perspective is still the canonical or privileged form of personal memory: I examine and criticize versions of this idea in relation to memory for skilled movement and memory for trauma.…”
Section: Field and Observer Perspectives In Personal Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It does not, in particular, begin to explore the importance of the flipping of perspectives, a topic of increasing current interest (Rice and Rubin 2009), or to construct a positive account of observer perspectives in personal memory and their significance. Here I argue that observer memories are genuine cases of remembering, analyzing the puzzling neglect of observer memories in Richard Wollheim's treatment of a range of closely related phenomena, and extending one of the few more recent philosophical treatments of the topic to date by Debus (2007). One might accept my case to that point, yet think that a field or 'own-eyes' visuospatial perspective is still the canonical or privileged form of personal memory: I examine and criticize versions of this idea in relation to memory for skilled movement and memory for trauma.…”
Section: Field and Observer Perspectives In Personal Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hoerl takes up the datum that Debus (2007) also isolates, and which I mentioned earlier with her conception of unmediated recollection. Unlike Debus, however, Hoerl proposes that such experience should count as a distinct species of recollectionmemory for what x looks like.…”
Section: The Positive Thesismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…12 Now, prima facie, encounters with visual art may seem different in this respect. Debus (2007) considers a recollected experience of the seeing of a correctlypositioned Mondrian on a gallery wall, and a hypothesised memory of a seeing the same work up-side down. Both experiences have as their object the same stripy, colourful formal object, but they have different phenomenal vehicles.…”
Section: Time-travel and The Transportative Phenomenology Of Phasic Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Philosophers have asked whether there can in fact be genuine memories in cases where past events are recalled from an external perspective that diverges from that of the agent's perceptual experience at the time (Vendler ; Debus ; Sutton ). But this distinction between field (internal) and observer (external) perspectives in remembering and imagining has also been studied intensively in applied domains of considerable independent interest.…”
Section: Perspective In Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 99%