Perspektif Hukum dalam Main Hakim Sendiri

Abstract

The mobs that have occurred in society, lately have been reported in both print and television media. The thieves were beaten black and blue, the rapists abused by the families of the victims, even more the incident of arson against suspected people of being a witch. It is undeniable that apart from big cities, beatings against people who are suspect of being crime suspects have also occurred in various regions.In Solok District (Nagarai), residents who were provoked by their emotions ganged up on a young man to death, which is consider to have often disturbed the peace and security of the local environment. The victim who did not accept the allegations then attempted to stab the youth leader who had advised him. Because he was annoyed, the youth leader who was followed by the villagers, chased the victim and beat him to death.Public unrest against the acts of robbery eventually led to the "street court," as described above for the perpetrators. Even if it has become a "tradition" in Indonesia, the perpetrators of crimes who have been arrested by the residents must feel the punishment of the "street judges" before being secured. However, the action of the "street judges" in the end also made it sad because it was too brutal and sadistic. Still fresh in the public's mind, the thugs in South Tangerang who were judged and burned alive by the masses as well as several years ago in the area around Kopti, Kalideres.According to researcher D A, from the Indonesian Survey Circle (LSI), he found four factors causing why some correspondents still choose to take justice into their own hands. First, the low level of public confidence that law enforcement officials will act fairly. According to the survey results showed that 46.7 percent of the public did not trust the authorities at all. Meanwhile, those who believed were 42.2 percent.The majority of the public also tends to believe that certain interests easily intervene in the legal process carried out by law enforcement agencies in Indonesia. For example, proximity to law enforcement agencies or material compensation. Meanwhile, only 23.4 percent still had hopes of law enforcement officials that they could work independently. "This picture shows that the public mindset is suspicious of the ongoing legal process.

Tindak Pidana Aborsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif HAM dan Hukum Positif Indonesia

“…Pada saat sekarang ini, aborsi adalah masalah yang cukup serius dan merupakan gejala yang sejak zaman dahulu dikenal oleh lapisan masyarakat diseluruh dunia terutama di Indonesia. Bila seorang wanita hamil tanpa diinginkannya, baik itu karena hamil diluar nikah, alasan faktor ekonomi, perselingkuhan, ataupun anaknya yang sudah terlalu banyak, maka ia akan melakukan segala cara untuk menggugurkan kandungannya, yang mana tindakan pengguguran kandungan tersebut dikenal dengan istilah aborsi (Asmarawati, 2013).…”

Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Pasal 75 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan

“…Anak dalam kandungan (janin) nantinya akan tumbuh menjadi anak dan berkembang selayaknya manusia. Undang-Undang ini secara terperinci mengatur masalah hak untuk hidup dan hak untuk tidak dihilangkan paksa atau tidak dihilangkan nyawanya (Asmarawati, 2013). Ini berarti secara jelas dikatakan dalam Undang-Undang tersebut bahwa janin juga memiliki hak untuk hidup sejak masih di dalam kandungan, dan tentu saja siapapun tidak berhak secara paksa menghilangkan nyawa janin di dalam kandungan termasuk ibu yang mengandungnya.…”

“…Abortus ini dilakukan karena program keluarga yang gagal, hamil karena akibat perselingkuhan, atau hamil diluar pernikahan. Wanita ini menggugurkan kandungan agar dapat menutup perbuatan aib (Asmarawati, 2013).…”