Persuasive nature of image schematic devices in advertising: their use for introducing sexisms

Abstract

This paper explores how persuasive is the exploitation of image-schematic devices in advertising, more specifically how they are used for introducing sexism. Using a combined axiological-relevance-theoretic approach we have analysed ten advertisements selected from an online corpus, 'The Advertising is Good for You' blog, and its section on 'Sexist Advertising'. Our analyses have proved that image schematic devices are used to introduce sexism in the advertisements under analysis, mostly the image schemas of space, force, multiplicity and attribute, and mostly by means of covert and weakly overt forms of communication. These image schematic devices seem to be not merely representative of universal experience, but crucially tied to specific socio-cultural cognition, as also suggested by Sinha (2002), Kimmel (2005) and Zlatev (2005), and special cognitive effort and effects are involved with understanding them. Yet, although they seem to contradict a formal application of the Principle of Relevance, as they involve additional processing effort, this is often offset by the extra effects like the pleasure in processing the ad and 'getting' the right meaning and value(s). This pleasurable experience is one important way in which advertisements are persuasive (MeyersLevy and Malaviya, 1999).

Metaphoric moral framing and image-text relations in the op-ed genre

“…Magazine covers offer a vision of the world and of reality, and they present a strong symbolic meaning, seeking the greatest visual impact in order to transmit emotions. Considering magazine covers as self-advertising, as mentioned above, we should bear in mind that as advertising messages are inspired by a great number of metaphors, metonymies and image schemas which seek to differentiate one product or service from the rest (Ungerer, 2000;Cortés de los Ríos, 2001;Rocamora Abellán, 2004;Forceville, 1996Forceville, & 2006Velasco Sacristán & Cortés de los Ríos, 2009;among others), magazine covers also present the same cognitive structures and mental patterns.…”

A multimodal analysis of cognitive tools portraying terrorist affairs

“…Others have studied the use of these tools in specialized language such as winespeak (e.g. Caballero & Suárez-Toste, 2008) Ríos, 2009;Forceville, 1996Forceville, , 2008Forceville, , 2009Koller 2009), and film (e.g. Eggerstsson & Forceville, 2009;Forceville, 2016).…”