2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
76
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Debate remains about how significantly ENPs released into soil will affect soil microbial communities (21,31,35,50). Pure culture studies regularly report both acute toxicity and sublethal effects of ENPs on bacteria through mechanisms including membrane disorganization, DNA damage, surface-coating-related photocatalytic oxidation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (5,10,23,44).…”
Section: Do Enps Affect Soil Bacterial Communities?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Debate remains about how significantly ENPs released into soil will affect soil microbial communities (21,31,35,50). Pure culture studies regularly report both acute toxicity and sublethal effects of ENPs on bacteria through mechanisms including membrane disorganization, DNA damage, surface-coating-related photocatalytic oxidation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (5,10,23,44).…”
Section: Do Enps Affect Soil Bacterial Communities?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that ENPs could be toxins when released into soil, e.g., harming or killing microorganisms. However, while some studies evaluating ENP effects on soil communities reported shifts in bacterial community composition and reduced biomass and enzyme activities (16,21,35), others found subtle (31) or no (50) effects of ENPs on soil microbial communities. The apparent con- tradiction of soil microbial responses to ENPs could be partially caused by the inherent toxicity differences among ENPs (e.g., metal/metal oxides versus fullerenes) (1,26,28) and also possibly by differences among soils used in experiments (49) or experimental conditions.…”
Section: Do Enps Affect Soil Bacterial Communities?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification of the partial rRNA gene sequences used forward (GC-338f) and reverse (907r) primers [32,33] as described by Chu et al [34]. After initially inspecting the products (629 bp) on 1% agarose gel, amplified DNAs were separated on 6% (w/v) polyacrylamide (acrylamide:bisacrylamided 37.5:1) gels, using a denaturing gradient of 2.8 to 4.2 M urea and 16 to 24% formamide in 40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA at 65 V and 608C for 20 h. Gels were stained with SYBR Green (Invitrogen), scanned with a ChemiGenius scanner (Syngene), and analyzed in Quantity One image analysis software, version 4.6.7 (Bio-Rad Laboratories), as Kumar et al [8] described. Statistical calculations on band numbers were similar to those described for the FAME analysis.…”
Section: Community Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, millions of tonnes of NPs are currently manufactured yearly [6], with every expectation that production will continue to increase. Given these many applications, it is strange that few studies have investigated the influence of NPs on microbial biodiversity in situ [7,8]. This is vital, because it is well known that any change in soil community structure can have significant consequences for ecosystems, including plant growth [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they reported a reduction in cellspecific bacterial activity after a 5-day exposure, which is in contrast to our study, showing enhanced activity rates under in situ conditions. Changes in community structure were also observed for soil bacteria following exposures to TiO2, ZnO, Ag and Cu nanoparticles (Ge et al 2011, Kumar et al 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%