2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation of old knowledge precedes integration of new knowledge

Abstract: The importance of memory consolidation in integrating new knowledge has received much recent attention in the field of word learning. Less examined is the change in existing word knowledge as a result of learning, which we hypothesize to occur prior to the opportunity for consolidation. To test this, we had participants learn new meanings for known words and novel words. Then they performed a one-back task on a list of words that included the trained words followed by words that probed either their new or orig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(68 reference statements)
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, due to the similarity in lexical form across languages, facilitation may be observed compared to control items (Mulík, Carrasco‐Ortiz, & Amengual, 2019). Evidence for this suggestion comes from within‐language vocabulary learning, in which learning of a new meaning for a known word is compared to learning of novel words (e.g., Fang & Perfetti, 2017). Such learning of a new meaning for a known word resembles FC learning in the need to map a novel meaning to the same known form.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, due to the similarity in lexical form across languages, facilitation may be observed compared to control items (Mulík, Carrasco‐Ortiz, & Amengual, 2019). Evidence for this suggestion comes from within‐language vocabulary learning, in which learning of a new meaning for a known word is compared to learning of novel words (e.g., Fang & Perfetti, 2017). Such learning of a new meaning for a known word resembles FC learning in the need to map a novel meaning to the same known form.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modulation of the LPC is found when the prime and the target word are semantically related (LPC priming effect; e.g., Bakker et al., 2015; Hoshino & Thierry, 2012; Kandhadai & Federmeier, 2010) as compared to when prime and target are unrelated. In the novel word learning and semantic processing literature, the N400 is taken to index relatively automatic aspects of semantic access, whereas LPC modulation is associated with more strategic/explicit and controlled aspects of semantic retrieval, integration and revision (e.g., Bakker et al., 2015; Deacon, Hewitt, Yang, & Nagata, 2000; Fang & Perfetti, 2017; Hoshino & Thierry, 2012; Kandhadai & Federmeier, 2010; Rohaut et al., 2015).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study investigated the effect of the number of exposures on adults’ incidental learning and long‐term retention of new meanings for familiar words in L1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use this more naturalistic approach to explore the incidental learning of homonyms because previous studies investigating this phenomenon have used more intentional and less naturalistic learning conditions (Fang & Perfetti, ; Fang et al., ; Rodd et al., ).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%