Pesantren As An Alternative Education: Case Study On Motives Of Students' Guardians In The Islamic Boarding School Universitas Islam Indonesia

Abstract

Pesantren, as an authentic educational institution initiated by Indonesian Muslims, provides parents an effective alternative to educate their children. For years, pesantren has proven trusted in educating youth and establishing a standard in both general and religious educations. In this study, the researchers will discuss factors that motivate parents to entrust pesantren as the institution to educate their children. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection methods include observation, interviews, and the results of relevant studies. After analyzing the data, the results indicate that there are two types of motives among parents. First is general motivation in placing children in pesantren, namely intrinsic motivation which covers parents' ideals having a generation with the quality of faith and good moral conduct, forming morals, and building strong physical and mental. The other factor is extrinsic motivation, including intense, integrated, and comprehensive Islamic teaching, positive activities carried out continuously for 24 hours, and proper coaching methods. Conclusion: The two factors indicate that parents' motivation to entrust pesantren as an educational institution is relevant to current conditions in which the younger generation is prone to moral depravity.

Indirect Evidence in Disclosing Cartel Violations Under Business Competition Law in Indonesia

“…01 K/KPPU/2011 concerning the garlic cartel case, which justifies indirect evidence as valid evidence in handling cartel cases, and becomes the legal basis for the permissibility of indirect evidence as the basis for handling cartel cases and other business competition cases (Supriatna et al, 2022). Indirect evidence, such as market data, economic analysis, correspondence, and testimony, can indicate alleged business competition violations but must be supported by other evidence (Rahmah, 2018). The regulation allows KPPU to use circumstantial evidence in investigations, contrasting with guidance evidence, which is the knowledge of the Commission Council.…”