2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-023-02534-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pest species identification algorithm based on improved YOLOv4 network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DL has garnered significant attention and application in the domain of pest monitoring [52,53]. Recent researches [54][55][56][57][58][59][60] exhibit the YOLO series' efficacy in addressing diverse crop-related challenges. However, CNNs base on DL approaches, have limitations in practical pest detection scenarios [61], restricting their real-world applicability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL has garnered significant attention and application in the domain of pest monitoring [52,53]. Recent researches [54][55][56][57][58][59][60] exhibit the YOLO series' efficacy in addressing diverse crop-related challenges. However, CNNs base on DL approaches, have limitations in practical pest detection scenarios [61], restricting their real-world applicability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to pest identification in the field of jute, in other areas of crop pest identification, we also learned that pest species identification has problems such as small targets being easily lost, dense distribution of pests, individual recognition rate, etc. To improve the efficiency of pest detection further, Song, Limei et al [17] proposed an algorithm for pest species identification based on the YOLOv4 network, DF-YOLO; they introduced the DenseNet network into the YOLOv4 backbone network CSPDarknet53 to introduce DenseNet network to enhance the feature extractor capability of the model, improve the individual recognition rate of densely distributed targets, use the focal loss function to improve the effect of sample imbalance on training and optimize the mining process of complex samples, the algorithm achieved 94.89% mAP after testing on the homemade pest dataset, which is better than the improved the previous YOLOv4 by 4.66%. Wang, Xinming et al [18] compared the performance of two well-known target detection and classification models, YOLOv4 and YOLOv7, in detecting different leaf diseases.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%