2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET CMRglc mapping and 1H-MRS show altered glucose uptake and neurometabolic profiles in BDL rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 A striking example is hepatic encephalopathy, in which brain Gln is increased by more than 100% as a result of excessive ammonia reaching the brain. [25][26][27][28] In that context, DWS probed an increase in metabolite diffusivities, including in Gln, in the cerebellum of a rat model of the disease, consistent with the loss of neuronal and astrocytic internal structure observed by histology. 29,30 Yet, a reliable estimation of Gln diffusion properties in the control group, in which its concentration is not as high as in hepatic encephalopathy, still remains challenging.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 A striking example is hepatic encephalopathy, in which brain Gln is increased by more than 100% as a result of excessive ammonia reaching the brain. [25][26][27][28] In that context, DWS probed an increase in metabolite diffusivities, including in Gln, in the cerebellum of a rat model of the disease, consistent with the loss of neuronal and astrocytic internal structure observed by histology. 29,30 Yet, a reliable estimation of Gln diffusion properties in the control group, in which its concentration is not as high as in hepatic encephalopathy, still remains challenging.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Yet, Gln is a desired target for DWS studies because it plays an important role in various pathologies and is an astrocyte‐specific marker due to the exclusive location of glutamine synthetase in the astrocytes 24 . A striking example is hepatic encephalopathy, in which brain Gln is increased by more than 100% as a result of excessive ammonia reaching the brain 25–28 . In that context, DWS probed an increase in metabolite diffusivities, including in Gln, in the cerebellum of a rat model of the disease, consistent with the loss of neuronal and astrocytic internal structure observed by histology 29,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 On the other hand, brain glutamine showed the largest increase in the cerebellum and the smallest in the striatum of BDL rats using identical magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements, 42 confirming the already suspected brain metabolic regional difference in cirrhosis-induced HE. 10 In parallel, decreased glucose uptake has previously been measured ex vivo (brain tissue) 15 and in vivo ([18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [ 18 F-FDG PET] 43 ; plasma and cortex) using animal models similar to those used in the present study. These brain alterations indicate a dysmetabolic state and dysfunctional neurotransmission that could be arising owing to impaired delivery production and/or release of these energy substrates/neurotransmitters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission systems are known to be affected in HE 60 . Previous works in BDL rats reported decreased cerebellar Glu 52 , 53 , while GABA levels in the cerebellum were either stable 52 or decreased 53 . Herein, the reasons behind the observed decrease in Glu and GABA compared to the negative control and the role of 2-octynoHA in this process remain unclear warranting further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The metabolites were assessed in the cerebellum as this region was previously shown to exhibit more distinct changes (i.e. in Gln) compared to the hippocampus in HE in BDL rats 52 , 53 . A significant 28% decrease in brain Gln was observed in the group treated with 2-octynoHA-based solution compared to the negative control group (5.1 ± 1.1 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2 mmol/kg ww , multiplicity adjusted p = 0.0019) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%