1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00788-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PET, CT, and MRI with Combidex for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerable range of CVs for inflammatory LNs (0.07-0.32) in this study might be due F-FDG uptake. Several studies have used an SUV threshold of 2.5 for differentiating benign and metastatic mediastinal LN in lung cancer [13][14][15]. Hellwig et al [13] preferred to use 2.5 as cutoff value, instead of 4.5 as their best accuracy, in order to reduce the FN results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The considerable range of CVs for inflammatory LNs (0.07-0.32) in this study might be due F-FDG uptake. Several studies have used an SUV threshold of 2.5 for differentiating benign and metastatic mediastinal LN in lung cancer [13][14][15]. Hellwig et al [13] preferred to use 2.5 as cutoff value, instead of 4.5 as their best accuracy, in order to reduce the FN results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uptake of the 18 F-FDG-avid LNs was also visually scored using three grades of intensity of mediastinal blood pool (0=similar with mediastinal blood pool, 1=faintly positive, 2=definitely positive). SUV threshold of 2.5 was used for differentiating between metastatic and benign LNs in lung cancer [13][14][15]. Highly attenuated nodes were defined as those that had HU max >120 [16] as one of the diagnostic criteria in determining benign LN in patients with non-smallcell lung cancer.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kernstine et al [20] reported the sensitivity of PET, CT and MRI as 70%, 65% and 86%, respectively along with a specificity of 86%, 79% and 82%. No significant difference was found between the three methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been widely studied, with a trend to upstaging compared to conventional CT scans along with [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] a change in clinical management [20][21][22][23][24][25] . In fact, the intensity of FDG uptake in NSCLC, as measured by highest standard uptake value [SUV max ] has also been shown to correlate with prognosis [26] .…”
Section: -[18f]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (Fdg) Positron Emission Tommentioning
confidence: 99%