2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrochemistry of subvolcanic dike swarms associated with the Golden Revenue Au–Cu and the Stoddart Mo–Cu±W mineralizations (Dawson Range, Yukon Territory, Canada) and implications for ore genesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the mineralogical characteristics of Bi:(Te+S) inclusions in gold from both Nucleus/Revenue and Sonora Gulch are consistent with a relatively reduced intrusion as described by Allan et al (2013). Betsi and Lentz (2011) presented a paragenesis for the Nucleus deposit which showed a strong Bi-BiS component but not Bi-Te±S minerals reported in the current study. The apparent disparity may be a function of local conditions of mineralization and prevailing fTe as suggested by Tooth et al (2011).…”
Section: Comparison Of Microchemical Signatures Of Gold From Differencontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the mineralogical characteristics of Bi:(Te+S) inclusions in gold from both Nucleus/Revenue and Sonora Gulch are consistent with a relatively reduced intrusion as described by Allan et al (2013). Betsi and Lentz (2011) presented a paragenesis for the Nucleus deposit which showed a strong Bi-BiS component but not Bi-Te±S minerals reported in the current study. The apparent disparity may be a function of local conditions of mineralization and prevailing fTe as suggested by Tooth et al (2011).…”
Section: Comparison Of Microchemical Signatures Of Gold From Differencontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The apparent disparity may be a function of local conditions of mineralization and prevailing fTe as suggested by Tooth et al (2011). In conclusion, it seems likely that the reduced nature of the Nucleus/Revenue intrusion (perhaps a consequence of the assimilation of reduced crust, Betsi and Lentz 2011) explains the importance of the bismuth telluride collector model both here and at Sonora Gulch. Figure 3c shows that for all Nucleus-Revenue samples, the host alloy of chalcopyrite and pyrite inclusions exhibit higher Ag values than the gold associated with bismuth-bearing minerals.…”
Section: Comparison Of Microchemical Signatures Of Gold From Differenmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…). Both plutons and dikes are mostly of granitic and locally of granodioritic compositions, essentially peraluminous, and were classified as ilmenite and S‐type granitoids (Bineli Betsi & Lentz, , ). Plutonic bodies are mainly composed of: (i) medium‐grained, and equigranular leucogranite; (ii) fine‐grained, foliated and unfoliated, locally porphyritic leucrogranite (microgranite of Sexton et al , ), and; (iii) rare medium‐grained biotite–hornblende granite.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veins within the Nucleus deposit occur as numerous sets (Fig. ) with variable mineralogy, shapes, and textures that cut and are crosscut by intrusions thus suggesting multiple cycles of fluid flux from intrusion(s) (see Bineli Betsi & Lentz, ) and vein emplacements. The dominant vein/veinlet types identified at the Nucleus deposit, as reported in Table , are classified by mineralogy, and structure into the following groups: quartz‐pyrite veinlets, quartz–sulfide veins, quartz–sericite veinlets, molybdenite veins, Au‐bearing veins, Bi‐rich veins, arsenopyrite‐rich veins, and late carbonate veins (see Table ).…”
Section: Types Of Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in the Freegold Mountain area include reconnaissancescale mapping (Tempelman-Kluit 1984;Carlson 1987;Payne et al 1987), geochronology (U-Pb) investigations (Bineli Betsi and Bennett 2010), investigation of the petrogenesis of subvolcanic dykes (McInnes et al 1988;Smuk et al 1997;Bineli Betsi and Lentz 2011), and detailed investigation of mineralized zones, such as (i) Laforma Au deposit and its two adjacent prospects, the Antoniuk Au-bearing breccias and the Emmons Hill polymetallic veins (McInnes et al 1990), (ii) Tinta Hill base-metal-Au-Ag deposit (Morin 1981;Smuk et al 1997), and (iii) nucleus Au-Bi-Cu-As mineralization. However, studies elucidating the thermal history and exhumation rate of different mineralized systems are missing, even though these factors are critical to our understanding of genesis, grade, and the temporal distribution of ore deposits (McInnes et al 2005aKesler and Wilkinson 2006;Uchida et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%