Petroleum.  Analytical and process instrumentation

Loveland, J. W.; White, Caroline

doi:10.1021/ac50013a027

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 117 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…65 Adopting this approach, the courts would continue to foster a system of rights protection that supersedes, on grounds of utility to individual litigants, the limited protection offered by the Strasbourg court. 66 The demonstrated willingness of the courts to award a degree of primacy to political expression is important even in the context of limitations imposed by statute. It suggests that while judges will not be able simply to 'develop' apposite solutions as with the common law, they will be ready to utilise the mechanisms allotted by the Human Rights Act 1998.…”

Section: Veneration Of Political Expression: the Convention And The Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising

Scott¹

2003

Modern Law Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers the legality of the broadcasting prohibition on ‘advocacy advertising’– the use of advertising space to communicate social, political and moral arguments to a wider public – in the light of the growing jurisprudence on the freedom of political expression. The prohibition is currently found in the Broadcasting Act 1990, and the Government has proposed its reiteration in the forthcoming Communications Bill to fall within the regulatory ambit of OFCOM. The paper begins by introducing and illustrating advocacy advertising and the restrictions upon it. It proceeds to review the relevant jurisprudence on political expression, to analyse the familiar arguments in favour of retention of the prohibition, and to weigh the counter‐arguments. The paper concludes that the purported justifications sit ill against existing legal rulings, and evidence a poor understanding of the critical sophistication of the public as a broadcasting audience. It suggests that a continuation of the prohibition would be unlawful.

show abstract

Section: Veneration Of Political Expression: the Convention And The Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising

Scott¹

2003

Modern Law Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Petroleum. Analytical and process instrumentation

Cited by 1 publication

References 117 publications

‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising

‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About