2000
DOI: 10.1190/1.1438630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petroleum geostatistics for nongeostatisticians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where C 0 is the nugget, C 1 the sill, and α the range of influence. The nugget effect C 0 can be interpreted as random noise, as short-scale variability, or as the measurement error [28]. The semivariograms were interpreted by fitting a Gaussian model (Equation (2)) on experimental data to estimate the nugget effect C 0 and the range of influence α.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Effective Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C 0 is the nugget, C 1 the sill, and α the range of influence. The nugget effect C 0 can be interpreted as random noise, as short-scale variability, or as the measurement error [28]. The semivariograms were interpreted by fitting a Gaussian model (Equation (2)) on experimental data to estimate the nugget effect C 0 and the range of influence α.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Effective Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the approximation of the values of a variable at locations that have not been sampled, the procedures, in the context of Earth Sciences, involve well-known interpolation techniques like linear regression, ordinary kriging and co-kriging [19][20][21][22]. Regionalized variable theory has been used to estimate soil data providing a summary of soil variability in the form of a semi-variogram and a predictive technique, kriging, for unobserved values [23,24].…”
Section: Spatial Predictive Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noticed by Mohaghegh et al (2006), this restriction of proxy models is mainly due to "curse of dimensionality" given the high number of parameters that define a reservoir geological model. Besides, single-value parameterizations do not preserve geological consistency (spatial covariance model) required in a thorough treatment of petrophysical uncertainty (Chambers et al, 2000). An attempt to solve the issue was proposed by Zabalza-Mezghani et al, (2004).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%