2020
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.8307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petroleum Subsidy Withdrawal, Fuel Price Hikes and the Nigerian Economy

Abstract: The study investigated petroleum subsidy withdrawal, fuel price hikes and the Nigerian economy. The purpose of the study was to determine the extent to which the removals of petroleum subsidies stimulate hikes in fuel prices and increases in the prices of products of other sectors in the Nigerian economy. It employed input-output model to determine the value added per sector from the computed table of flow of goods. Subsequently, the impacts of reductions in petroleum subsidies (10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50%) on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also harmed industrial firms that depended heavily on imported machinery, replacement parts, and raw materials [51][52][53][54]. As a result, this result can be explained in part by the notion that advanced nations are forcing their conditions on former colonial countries like Nigeria, who have become heavily reliant on natural resource exports like oil [55]. Furthermore, one of the most problematic aspects of the IMF is the widespread belief among recipients that they would be unable to overcome any prospective economic setback without the support or "benefit program" of foreign industrialized "rich" countries [56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also harmed industrial firms that depended heavily on imported machinery, replacement parts, and raw materials [51][52][53][54]. As a result, this result can be explained in part by the notion that advanced nations are forcing their conditions on former colonial countries like Nigeria, who have become heavily reliant on natural resource exports like oil [55]. Furthermore, one of the most problematic aspects of the IMF is the widespread belief among recipients that they would be unable to overcome any prospective economic setback without the support or "benefit program" of foreign industrialized "rich" countries [56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the nation was exposed to the manipulation of independent industries by eliminating subsidies. This is because the full removal of subsidy would give these industrialists a reason or excuse to increase the price of fuel uncontrollably, and so the victims of abuse will still remain members of the public (Adebayo, 2018;ANAGUN, 2020;Inegbedion, Inegbedion, Obadiaru, & Asaleye, 2020;O'Neil, 2019;Sheyin, 2018). In most cases, however, Nigerian leaders were more interested about the satisfaction that they would achieve from any policy they would execute and not think about anything that would contribute to the growth of the people and the country (Babatunde, 2018;Sorensen, 2018).…”
Section: Its Implication On Standards Of Living In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badly targeted subsidy programmes are alleged to have worsened macroeconomic problems (KPMG, 2023). There is extant literature on the macroeconomic implications of oil price shocks and fuel subsidies, especially in resource-rich emerging economies (Inegbedion et al, 2020). Consequently, some focused on the potential impacts of fuel subsidy reforms on the domestic economies of oil-producing countries (KPMG, 2023;NESG, 2022;PWC, 2023;Breton & Mirzapour, 2016;Dennis, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%