1984
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(84)90214-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrologic model of the northern Mississippi Embayment based on satellite magnetic and ground-based geophysical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following values for magnetic susceptibilities are used (see Fig. 9): 0.058 SI for the oceanic slab, and 0.013 SI for the continental crust (Nagata, 1969;Thomas, 1984). To fit the magnetic model with the observed anomaly we also included the effect of the Tuxtla alkaline basalts, using a 3 km thick layer with a high magnetic susceptibility of 0.19 SI.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Plate Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following values for magnetic susceptibilities are used (see Fig. 9): 0.058 SI for the oceanic slab, and 0.013 SI for the continental crust (Nagata, 1969;Thomas, 1984). To fit the magnetic model with the observed anomaly we also included the effect of the Tuxtla alkaline basalts, using a 3 km thick layer with a high magnetic susceptibility of 0.19 SI.…”
Section: Configuration Of the Plate Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Schnetzler [1984, andpersonal communication, 1984] compared measured coastal anomalies of shorter wavelength with those predicted from model studies and found the data to be statistically consistent with the models. Thomas [1984] derived a petrologic model of the northern Mississippi Embayment from gravity, seismic, and rift data.…”
Section: One Puzzling Characteristic Of Satellite Magnetic Anomaly Mamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They decay with altitude below the noise level of satellite data to the extent that at satellite altitudes a typical oceanic lithosphere cannot be distinguished from a nonmagnetic horizontal layer as far as its NRM is concerned. 1984;Johnson 1985;Frey 1985;Bradley & Frey 1988;Fullerton et al 1989;Toft & Arkani-Hamed 1992, 1993. The magnetization acquired by the lithosphere during the long normal polarity of the core field in the Cretaceous, produces appreciable magnetic signature at satellite altitudes (LaBrecque & Raymond 1985;Toft & Arkani-Hamed 1992).…”
Section: Removal Of the Core-field Componentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many of the anomalies have been related to known geologic features and their source bodies have quantitatively been modelled (e.g. Regan & Marsh 1982;Langel & Thorning 1982;Mayhew 1985;von Frese, Hinzel & Braile 1982;Schnetzler & Allenby 1983;Thomas 1984;Arkani-Hamed, Urquhart & Strangway 1984;Clark, Frey & Thomas 1985;Harrison, Carle & Hayling 1989;Fullerton et al 1989;Singh, Rajaram & Basavaiah 1989; see also the special issue of Geophysical Research Letters, 1982, 9, and the special issue of Journal of Geophysical Research 1985, 90, (B)). However, n o distinct magnetic signature is associated with the ocean-continent boundary except for a few locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%